...
首页> 外文期刊>Geographical Journal >Divergent geographies of policy and practice? Voluntarism and devolution in England, Scotland and Wales
【24h】

Divergent geographies of policy and practice? Voluntarism and devolution in England, Scotland and Wales

机译:政策和实践的地域不同?英格兰,苏格兰和威尔士的自愿主义和权力下放

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Across Great Britain, engagement with civil society is an increasingly central component of public policy and governance rhetoric. However, attention has tended to focus on policy developments emanating from Westminster that relate to England, rather than the policy and governance spaces' emerging in the devolved administrations, such as Scotland and Wales. It has also tended to focus on the organisations through which voluntary participation takes place, rather than on voluntary participation itself. In this paper we examine the extent to which there are divergent governance spaces with regards to voluntarism apparent at the national levels of England, Wales and Scotland, set against a backdrop of wider debates on devolution, civil society, community, and the Big Society. Given the common driver of public service reform which emerges from our review, we then examine the emergence of sub-national spaces' through the example of rural Scotland, in which the delivery of public services can be particularly challenging. Overall, we contend that public policy towards volunteering and the voluntary and community sector (VCS) in Scotland, Wales and England has been shaped by similar drivers, but the rhetoric surrounding their deployment and the distinct governance landscapes in Wales and Scotland have the capacity to influence the deployment of these goals in distinct ways. We also argue that greater attention may need to be paid to emergent sub-national' governances spaces of voluntarism.
机译:在整个英国,与公民社会的互动已成为公共政策和治理言论中日益重要的组成部分。但是,注意力往往集中在与英格兰有关的威斯敏斯特政策发展上,而不是苏格兰和威尔士等下放政府中出现的政策和治理空间。它还倾向于关注自愿参加的组织,而不是自愿参加本身。在本文中,我们考察了在权力下放,公民社会,社区和大社会的广泛辩论的背景下,在英格兰,威尔士和苏格兰的国家层面上,关于自愿主义的治理空间存在多大差异。考虑到从我们的评论中得出的公共服务改革的共同驱动力,我们然后以苏格兰乡村为例来考察次国家空间的出现,在公共苏格兰,公共服务的提供可能特别具有挑战性。总体而言,我们认为,苏格兰,威尔士和英格兰的志愿服务以及志愿和社区部门(VCS)的公共政策是由类似的驱动因素塑造而成的,但是围绕其部署的言论以及威尔士和苏格兰独特的治理格局都具有以不同的方式影响这些目标的部署。我们还认为,可能需要更多关注新兴的地方政府的自愿主义治理空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号