...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental psychology >Auditory distraction eliminates retrieval induced forgetting: Implications for the processing of unattended sound
【24h】

Auditory distraction eliminates retrieval induced forgetting: Implications for the processing of unattended sound

机译:听觉分心消除了因检索而引起的遗忘:对无人值守声音的处理意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Retrieval-Induced Forgetting (RIF) paradigm includes three phases: (a) study/encoding of category exemplars, (b) practicing retrieval of a sub-set of those category exemplars, and (c) recall of all exemplars. At the final recall phase, recall of items that belong to the same categories as those items that undergo retrieval practice, but that did not undergo retrieval practice themselves, is impaired. The received view is that this is because retrieval of target category-exemplars (e.g., "Tiger" in the category Four-legged animal) requires inhibition of nontarget category-exemplars (e.g., "Dog" and "Lion") that compete for retrieval. Here, we used the RIF paradigm to investigate whether ignoring auditory items during the retrieval-practice phase modulates the inhibitory process. In two experiments, RIF was present when retrieval practice was conducted in quiet and when it was conducted in the presence of spoken words that were drawn from a different category to that from which the targets for retrieval practice were selected. In contrast, RIF was abolished when words that were either identical to, or merely semantically related to, the retrieval-practice words were presented as background speech. The results suggest that the act of ignoring speech can reduce inhibition of the non-practiced category-exemplars, thereby eliminating RIF, but only when the spoken words are competitors for retrieval (i.e., belong to the same semantic category as the to-be-retrieved items).
机译:检索引起的遗忘(RIF)范式包括三个阶段:(a)研究/编码类别示例,(b)练习检索这些类别示例的子集,以及(c)召回所有示例。在最后的召回阶段,与那些经过检索练习但本身未经过检索练习的项目属于同一类别的项目的检索受到损害。收到的观点是,这是因为检索目标类别示例(例如,四足动物类别中的“老虎”)需要抑制竞争以进行检索的非目标类别示例(例如,“狗”和“狮子”) 。在这里,我们使用RIF范式来研究在检索练习阶段忽略听觉项目是否会调节抑制过程。在两个实验中,RIF是在安静地进行检索练习时和在存在口语单词的情况下进行的,而RIF是从与选择检索练习目标不同的类别中抽取出来的。相反,当与检索练习单词相同或仅在语义上相关的单词作为背景语音呈现时,RIF被取消。结果表明,无视语音的行为可以减少对非练习类别示例的抑制,从而消除RIF,但前提是口头单词是检索的竞争者(即与待测词属于相同的语义类别)检索到的项目)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号