...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of oral implantology >Rehabilitation of postrior atrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilot randomised clinical trial.
【24h】

Rehabilitation of postrior atrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilot randomised clinical trial.

机译:修复后部萎缩性无牙颌:用5 mm短种植体或更长的种植体在增强骨中支撑的假体?一项随机临床试验的一年结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether 5 mm short dental implants could be an alternative to augmentation with anorganic bovine bone and placement of at least 10 mm long implants in posterior atrophic jaws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with bilateral atrophic mandibles (5-7 mm bone height above the mandibular canal), and 15 patients with bilateral atrophic maxillae (4-6 mm bone height below the maxillary sinus) and bone thickness of at least 8 mm, were randomised according to a splitmouth design to receive one to three 5 mm short implants or at least 10 mm long implants in augmented bone. Mandibles were vertically augmented with interpositional bone blocks and maxillary sinuses with particulated bone via a lateral window. Implants were placed after 4 months, submerged and loaded, after 4 months, with provisional prostheses. Four months later, definitive provisionally cemented prostheses were delivered. Outcome measures were: prosthesis and implant failures, any complication and peri-implant marginal bone level changes. RESULTS: In 5 augmented mandibles, the planned 10 mm long implants could not be placed and shorter implants (7 and 8.5 mm) had to be used instead. One year after loading no patient dropped out. Two long (8.5 mm in the mandible and 13 mm in the maxilla) implants and one 5 mm short maxillary implant failed. There were no statistically significant differences in failures or complications. Patients with short implants lost on average 1 mm of peri-implant bone and patients with longer implants lost 1.2 mm. This difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that 1 year after loading, 5 mm short implants achieve similar if not better results than longer implants placed in augmented bone. Short implants might be a preferable choice to bone augmentation since the treatment is faster, cheaper and associated with less morbidity, however their long-term prognosis is unknown.
机译:目的:评估5mm短的牙种植体是否可以替代使用无机牛骨并在萎缩性后颌中放置至少10mm长的种植体。材料与方法:15例双侧萎缩性下颌骨(下颌骨上方骨高5-7毫米)和15例双侧萎缩性上颌骨(上颌窦以下骨高4-6毫米)且骨厚至少8毫米,根据裂口设计被随机分配,以在增强骨中接受一到三个5 mm短的植入物或至少10 mm长的植入物。下颌骨通过侧向窗在垂直方向上增加了插入性骨块,上颌窦增加了颗粒状骨。 4个月后放置植入物,浸没并在4个月后装入临时假体。四个月后,最终的临时胶合假体被交付。结果指标为:假体和植入物故障,任何并发症以及植入物周围边缘骨水平变化。结果:在5个增强型下颌骨中,无法放置计划的10毫米长的种植体,而必须使用较短的种植体(7和8.5毫米)。装载一年后,没有患者退出。两颗长(下颌骨为8.5毫米,上颌骨为13毫米)植入物和一颗5毫米短的上颌骨植入物失败了。失败或并发症没有统计学上的显着差异。植入物短的患者平均损失了1 mm的种植体周围骨,植入物较长的患者丢失了1.2 mm。这种差异具有统计学意义。结论:这项初步研究表明,加载后1年,5毫米短种植体取得的效果与长于植入骨中的长种植体相似甚至更好。较短的植入物可能是骨增强术的首选选择,因为治疗更快,更便宜且发病率更低,但是其长期预后尚不清楚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号