...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of oncology nursing: the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society >A comparison between infrared tympanic thermometry, oral and axilla with rectal thermometry in neutropenic adults.
【24h】

A comparison between infrared tympanic thermometry, oral and axilla with rectal thermometry in neutropenic adults.

机译:中性粒细胞减少症成人的红外鼓膜测温法,口腔测温法和腋窝与直肠测温法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the agreement between infrared tympanic membrane (TM), axillary, corrected axillary (+0.5 degrees C), oral, and corrected oral (+0.3 degrees C) to rectal thermometry as reference standard in neutropenic adults. The sensitivity and specificity of the mentioned thermometries in detecting rectal fever (> or =38 degrees C) were also analysed. METHOD: This is a comparative diagnostic test study. A total of 400 sets of blinded simultaneous temperature readings were measured from 21 haemato-oncology in-patients with neutropenia following chemotherapy. Three-hundred sets were then randomly sampled. Agreements were analysed using random two-way intraclass correlation (ICC). Sensitivity and specificity were analysed using contingency 2x2 table. FINDINGS: Both right and left TM thermometry have good correlation with rectal thermometry; 0.810 (95% CI, 0.748-0.855) and 0.770 (95% CI, 0.713-0.815) respectively. Axilla thermometry has weak agreement (ICC 0.486 (95% CI, 0.118-0.689)) with rectal thermometry. The sensitivity (sn) and specificity (sp) in detecting rectal fever (> or =38 degrees C) were: right TM (sn) 0.712 (95% CI, 0.586-0.814), (sp) 0.957 (95% CI, 0.920-0.978); oral (sn) 0.561 (95% CI, 0.433-0.681), (sp) 0.983 (95% CI, 0.954-0.995); and axilla (sn) 0.348 (95% CI, 0.238-0.477), (sp) 0.996 (95% CI, 0.973-0.999). INTERPRETATION: Single tympanic membrane thermometry is in good agreement with rectal thermometry. It is more sensitive than oral or axillary thermometry in detecting rectal fever.
机译:背景:本研究评估了中性粒细胞减少症成人的红外鼓膜(TM),腋窝,矫正腋窝(+0.5摄氏度),口服和矫正口腔(+0.3摄氏度)与直肠温度的一致性。还分析了上述测温法在检测直肠发烧(>或= 38摄氏度)中的敏感性和特异性。方法:这是一项比较诊断测试研究。从化疗后中性粒细胞减少症的21名血液肿瘤患者中测量了总共400组盲目同时温度读数。然后随机取样三百套。使用随机双向类内相关性(ICC)分析协议。使用偶发性2x2表格分析敏感性和特异性。结果:左,右TM体温计与直肠体温计有很好的相关性。分别为0.810(95%CI,0.748-0.855)和0.770(95%CI,0.713-0.815)。腋窝体温计与直肠体温计的一致性较弱(ICC 0.486(95%CI,0.118-0.689))。检测直肠发烧(>或= 38摄氏度)的灵敏度(sn)和特异性(sp)为:右TM(sn)0.712(95%CI,0.586-0.814),(sp)0.957(95%CI,0.920) -0.978);口服(sn)0.561(95%CI,0.433-0.681),(sp)0.983(95%CI,0.954-0.995);和腋窝(sn)0.348(95%CI,0.238-0.477),(sp)0.996(95%CI,0.973-0.999)。解释:单鼓膜测温法与直肠测温法非常吻合。在检测直肠发烧方面,它比口服或腋窝体温计更为灵敏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号