首页> 外文期刊>Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz >The acceptance of personal responsibility as a criterion in assigning health care benefits. An empirical study
【24h】

The acceptance of personal responsibility as a criterion in assigning health care benefits. An empirical study

机译:接受个人责任作为分配医疗保健福利的标准。实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to accomplish broad acceptance of priority setting in healthcare, a public debate seems essential, in particular, including the preferences of the general public. In Germany, objections to public involvement are to some extent based on the perception that individuals have an inherent personal bias and cannot represent interests other than their own. The following excerpt from a more comprehensive study reports on the acceptance of personal responsibility as a criterion for prioritizing. A mixed-methods design is used for combining a qualitative interview study and a quantitative survey representative of the German public. Both the interview study and the survey demonstrate that behavior that is harmful to one's health is generally accepted as a criterion for posteriorizing patients, mostly regardless of self interest. In addition, the interview study shows reasons for acceptance or refusal of the self-inflicted behavior criterion.
机译:为了使人们广泛接受医疗保健中的优先事项设置,似乎必须进行公开辩论,尤其是要考虑公众的偏好。在德国,对公众参与的反对在某种程度上是基于这样一种观念,即个人具有一种内在的个人偏见,不能代表自己以外的利益。以下摘录自更全面的研究报告了接受个人责任作为优先考虑的标准。混合方法设计用于结合定性访谈研究和德国公众的定量调查代表。访谈研究和调查均表明,对人体健康有害的行为通常被认为是使患者恶化的标准,而无论其自身利益如何。此外,访谈研究显示了接受或拒绝自我干预行为准则的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号