首页> 外文期刊>European Planning Studies >The impact of conflict on a country's economy: an obligatory response to Beatriz plaza
【24h】

The impact of conflict on a country's economy: an obligatory response to Beatriz plaza

机译:冲突对一国经济的影响:对Beatriz广场的强制性回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper is a response to Beatriz Plaza's reply to an article we wrote for European Planning Studies, 8(4) (2000). We argued that a society in which a wide range of agents and institutions exhibits a well-developed set of values (confidence, cooperation, solidarity, etc.) is likely to be more socio-economically efficient. We will demonstrate that our critic's reply makes absolutely no reference whatsoever to our article's central theses. Moreover the reply completely ignores the temporal context four article. We disagree with the manner m which our critic has presented the data to demonstrate' the negative impact of terrorism, something that is very obvious. The real effect of violence and terrorism on a society transcends what is reflected in data that are frequently incomplete and lacking in context. Empirical social analyses increasingly attempt to use more personalized, qualitative surveys, instead of econometric models that are not capable of explaining a richer social really. Analysis of the trends in and evolution of tourism could also help explain phenomena that extend beyond the strict scope f the Basque economy. Knowledge of the tourist sector and the capacity for sound analysis are prerequisites for anyone claiming to do a serious study or critique on the topic. Given the points cited above, we believe that our critic's reply to our article is incomplete, lacking in context useless, unnecessary, incoherent and demagogic. We thus still believe each and every one of the arguments in our article to be valid, and do not see how our critic has in any way called them into question. W' believe that our critic is completely ff the mark in criticizing us so harshly and so unfoundedly.
机译:本文是对Beatriz Plaza对我们为《欧洲规划研究》(European Planning Studies)撰写的文章的答复所致,第8(4)页(2000年)。我们认为,一个由众多代理和机构展现出一套完善的价值观(信心,合作,团结等)的社会可能会提高社会经济效率。我们将证明,批评家的答复绝对没有提及本文的核心论点。而且答复完全忽略了时间语境四篇。我们不同意我们的批评家提供数据以证明“恐怖主义的负面影响”的方式,这一点非常明显。暴力和恐怖主义对社会的实际影响超越了经常不完整且缺乏背景的数据所反映的内容。实证社会分析越来越多地尝试使用更具个性化,定性的调查,而不是无法真正解释更丰富的社会的计量经济学模型。对旅游业趋势和演变的分析也有助于解释超出巴斯克经济严格范围的现象。对旅游业的了解和进行声音分析的能力是声称对这个主题进行认真研究或批评的任何先决条件。鉴于以上提到的观点,我们认为批评家对本文的答复是不完整的,在上下文中缺乏无用,不必要,缺乏连贯性和迷惑性。因此,我们仍然认为本文中的每个论点都是有效的,并且看不到批评家如何以任何方式质疑它们。 W'相信我们的批评者如此严厉地,毫无根据地批评我们是完全正确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号