首页> 外文期刊>Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution >Perspective: Evolutionary developmental biology and the problem of variation [Review]
【24h】

Perspective: Evolutionary developmental biology and the problem of variation [Review]

机译:观点:进化发展生物学与变异问题[综述]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the oldest problems in evolutionary biology remains largely unsolved. Which mutations generate evolutionarily relevant phenotypic variation? What kinds of molecular changes do they entail? What are the phenotypic magnitudes, frequencies of origin, and pleiotropic effects of such mutations? How is the genome constructed to allow the observed abundance of phenotypic diversity? Historically, the neo-Darwinian synthesizers stressed the predominance of micromutations in evolution, whereas others noted the similarities between some dramatic mutations and evolutionary transitions to argue for macromutationism. Arguments on both sides have been biased by misconceptions of the developmental effects of mutations. For example, the traditional view that mutations of important developmental genes always have large pleiotropic effects can now be seen to be a conclusion drawn from observations of a small class of mutations with dramatic effects. It is possible that some mutations, for example, those in cis-regulatory DNA, have few or no pleiotropic effects and may be the predominant source of morphological evolution. In contrast, mutations causing dramatic phenotypic effects, although superficially similar to hypothesized evolutionary transitions, are unlikely to fairly represent the true path of evolution. Recent developmental studies of gene function provide a new way of conceptualizing and studying variation that contrasts with the traditional genetic view that was incorporated into neo-Darwinian theory and population genetics. This new approach in developmental biology is as important for microevolutionary studies as the actual results from recent evolutionary developmental studies. In particular, this approach will assist in the task of identifying the specific mutations generating phenotypic variation and elucidating how they alter gene function. These data will provide the current missing link between molecular and phenotypic variation in natural populations. [References: 146]
机译:进化生物学中最古老的问题之一仍未解决。哪些突变会产生进化相关的表型变异?它们需要什么样的分子变化?这些突变的表型大小,起源频率和多效性是什么?如何构建基因组以允许观察到的丰富的表型多样性?从历史上看,新达尔文式合成器强调了进化中微突变的优势,而其他人则指出了一些戏剧性突变与进化转变之间的相似性,以支持宏观突变。对突变的发展影响的误解使双方的观点都有偏差。例如,传统观点认为重要的发育基因的突变总是具有大的多效性作用,现在可以认为是对一小类具有显着作用的突变的观察得出的结论。某些突变(例如顺式调控DNA中的突变)可能很少或没有多效作用,并且可能是形​​态进化的主要来源。相反,引起突变的表型效应虽然表面上类似于假设的进化转变,但不可能公平地代表进化的真实路径。基因功能的最新发展研究提供了一种概念化和研究变异的新方法,这与纳入新达尔文理论和种群遗传学的传统遗传观点形成了鲜明的对比。发育生物学的这一新方法对于微进化研究而言,与最近的进化发展研究的实际结果一样重要。特别地,这种方法将有助于鉴定产生表型变异的特定突变,并阐明它们如何改变基因功能。这些数据将提供自然种群中分子和表型变异之间当前缺少的联系。 [参考:146]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号