...
首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Reply from authors re: Joshua J. Meeks, James A. Eastham. Robotic prostatectomy: The rise of the machines or judgment day. Eur Urol 2012;61:686-7: Robotic prostatectomy: Men versus machines - The machines are already here
【24h】

Reply from authors re: Joshua J. Meeks, James A. Eastham. Robotic prostatectomy: The rise of the machines or judgment day. Eur Urol 2012;61:686-7: Robotic prostatectomy: Men versus machines - The machines are already here

机译:作者的回复:约书亚·米克斯,詹姆斯·伊斯特姆。机器人前列腺切除术:机器的兴起或审判日。 Eur Urol 2012; 61:686-7:机器人前列腺切除术:男人与机器-机器已经在这里

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We read with great interest the editorial by Meeks and Eastham [1] commenting on our paper [2], which showed that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is associated with better perioperative outcomes relative to open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Several important points were raised that merit further discussion.
机译:我们非常感兴趣地阅读了Meeks和Eastham [1]在我们的论文[2]上发表的社论,该社论表明,与开放式根治性前列腺切除术(ORP)相比,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)与更好的围手术期结局相关。提出了一些重要的观点,值得进一步讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号