...
【24h】

The anatomical arrangement of the myocardial cells making up the ventricular mass.

机译:构成心室质量的心肌细胞的解剖结构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The architectural arrangement of the myocytes within the ventricular mass remains a highly contentious topic. It has recently been suggested by several distinguished surgeons that the overall myocardial structure is disposed in the form of a 'ventricular myocardial band'. There are, however, major anatomic deficiencies in this hypothesis, because the heart is formed on the basis of a modified blood vessel, rather than a collection of discrete muscular entities resembling the skeletal musculature. There is ample alternative evidence, nonetheless, already existing to provide a suitable explanation for the 'forceful reciprocal twisting' of the ventricular mass that is seen by cardiac surgeons during operative procedures. We provide here, therefore, a review of the anatomical studies we have performed separately and conjointly over a period of nearly 30 years. As before, we show that there is no anatomic evidence to support the concept of the 'ventricular myocardial band'. The overall arrangement is for the myocytes to be supported as the muscular components of a continuous and complex mass, the supporting collagenous fibrous matrix possessing epimysial, perimysial, and endomysial components. It had already been discussed at length during the previous century why there was no anatomic evidence to support the existence of separate 'muscles' within the ventricular continuum. There are no fibrous sheaths within the ventricular walls that permit the myofibres to be dissected on the basis of muscle bundles having a discrete origin and insertion, as is the case with the arrangement of the skeletal muscles. We have never sought ourselves, however, to deny the central helical nature of the overall architecture of the ventricular walls. The anatomic evidence supporting an overall helical nature for the ventricular myocardium has existed for over 150 years. All the available evidence, nonetheless, shows that these helical patterns are to be found throughout the walls, and in no way constitute a unique myocardial band.
机译:心室块内肌细胞的结构安排仍然是一个有争议的话题。几位杰出的外科医生最近建议,将整个心肌结构以“心室心肌带”的形式放置。但是,在该假设中存在主要的解剖缺陷,因为心脏是基于改良的血管形成的,而不是像骨骼肌肉组织那样的离散肌肉实体的集合。尽管如此,已有足够的替代证据为心脏外科医生在手术过程中看到的心室块的“强力往复扭曲”提供适当的解释。因此,我们在这里提供了我们在近30年的时间里分别进行的解剖学研究的综述。如前所述,我们表明没有解剖学证据支持“心室心肌带”的概念。总体布置是使肌细胞作为连续和复杂团块的肌肉成分得到支撑,支撑的胶原纤维基质具有上皮,周围肌层和肌内膜成分。在上个世纪已经进行了详尽的讨论,为什么没有解剖学证据来支持心室连续体内存在单独的“肌肉”。在心室壁内没有纤维鞘,其允许肌纤维根据具有不连续起源和插入的肌肉束而被解剖,如骨骼肌的布置那样。但是,我们从来没有想过要否认心室壁整体结构的中心螺旋性质。支持心室心肌整体螺旋性质的解剖学证据已经存在了150多年。尽管如此,所有可用的证据都表明,这些螺旋形图案遍布整个壁面,绝不构成独特的心肌带。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号