...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of emergency medicine: Official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine >Does nonmedical hospital admission staff accurately triage emergency department patients?
【24h】

Does nonmedical hospital admission staff accurately triage emergency department patients?

机译:非医疗住院人员是否准确地对急诊科患者进行分类?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Utilization of hospital emergency departments (EDs) is continuously increasing. Though nurses and physicians are ultimately responsible for the definite triage decisions, initial ED patient triage is frequently performed by hospital admission staff. This study analyzes the quality of assessment of the severity of emergencies and the choice of treatment unit made by hospital admission staff. METHODS: One thousand fifty-nine consecutive surgical and medical patients entering the ED of the University Hospital Basel during an 11-day period were independently assessed by hospital admission staff without formal medical training, ED nursing staff, and ED physicians. Emergencies were classified by severity (intervention within minutes/hours/days) or by severity and resource utilization (immediate intervention with/without life-threatening condition, delayed intervention with high/lowo demand of resources). Emergency assessment and triage decision (surgical/medical, outpatient/inpatient treatment) were documented independently by all three ED staff groups. RESULTS: In 64% of the cases, initial assessment by admission staff corresponded with the final assessment by the ED physician. Concordance was, however, poor (kappa=0.23). Underestimation of the severity occurred in 7.5% of cases without severe or lethal consequences. Ninety-four percent of patients were treated in the unit to which they were originally triaged by the admission staff. CONCLUSION: Triage quality regarding the choice of treatment unit was found to be excellent, whereas the quality of the assessment of the severity of the emergency by nonmedical ED admission staff was acceptable. ED patients have to be assessed by medical staff early after admission to ensure adequate and timely interventions.
机译:目标:医院急诊室(EDs)的使用正在不断增加。尽管护士和医生最终负责确定的分诊决定,但最初的ED患者分诊通常由医院的入院人员进行。这项研究分析了紧急情况严重程度的评估质量以及住院人员选择治疗单位的质量。方法:在没有经过正规医学培训的入院人员,ED护理人员和ED医师的陪同下,对在11天之内进入巴塞尔大学医院急诊室的159例外科手术和内科患者进行了独立评估。紧急情况按严重程度(在几分钟/小时/天之内进行干预)或严重程度和资源利用(有/无生命危险条件下的立即干预,有高/低/无资源需求的延迟干预)进行分类。急诊评估和分类决定(外科/医疗,门诊/住院治疗)由所有三个急诊人员独立记录。结果:在64%的病例中,入院人员的初步评估与ED医师的最终评估相符。但是,一致性差(kappa = 0.23)。在7.5%的病例中,严重程度被低估了,没有严重或致命的后果。 94%的患者在最初由入院人员分类的病房中接受了治疗。结论:关于治疗单位选择的分诊质量被认为是优秀的,而非医学急诊科的急诊人员对紧急情况严重程度的评估质量是可以接受的。 ED患者入院后必须尽早进行医务人员评估,以确保及时采取适当的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号