首页> 外文期刊>European journal of health law >Dangerous patients and duties to warn: a European human rights perspective.
【24h】

Dangerous patients and duties to warn: a European human rights perspective.

机译:危险患者和警告职责:欧洲人权的观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The recent case of David Bradley, who shot and killed four members of his family after telling his doctor he 'wanted to kill someone', has raised the question of whether a healthcare professional could ever be held liable for failing to take steps to constrain a potentially dangerous patient. Until recently, it was considered that the United Kingdom courts would be reluctant to impose a duty to protect third parties. However, the European Court of Human Rights' decision in Osman v UK--while not directly concerning healthcare professionals--has opened the door for just such a duty. When this duty will arise, and how it can be discharged, remain challenging questions. Furthermore, healthcare professionals face the unenviable task of balancing competing duties, in which the rights--and safety--of their patients must also be borne in mind.
机译:大卫·布拉德利(David Bradley)的最近一案,在告诉医生“想要杀死某人”之后开枪打死了他的四名家庭成员,这引发了一个问题,即医疗专业人员是否会因未能采取措施约束一名医生而被追究法律责任?有潜在危险的病人。直到最近,人们还认为联合王国法院不愿施加保护第三方的义务。但是,欧洲人权法院在Osman诉UK一案中的判决虽然没有直接涉及医疗保健专业人员,却为此类职责打开了大门。何时履行这项职责以及如何履行职责,仍然是充满挑战的问题。此外,医疗保健专业人员面临平衡竞争职责这一艰巨的任务,其中还必须牢记患者的权利和安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号