首页> 外文期刊>European journal of health law >Semantic, pedantic or paradigm shift? Recruitment, retention and property in modern population biobanking.
【24h】

Semantic, pedantic or paradigm shift? Recruitment, retention and property in modern population biobanking.

机译:语义,学问或范式转换?现代人口生物库中的招聘,保留和财产。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Evolving uses of human biological material, including their collection and retention in biobanks and their distribution to diverse projects, are sites of great tension from the human rights perspective. In the medical-legal setting, these rights are often protected and realised through consent practices. In the biobank setting, there endures a widely shared concern over consent, and the many divergent ways it is fashioned and deployed. This article reconsiders consent in the biobank setting, first, addressing the theoretical foundation of consent and its deployment in the broader medical context, second, examining the nature of biobanks and the uncomfortable position of consent therein, and finally, offering a means of approaching recruitment and retention in the biobank setting which is sensitive to originator interests, including human dignity, doing so within the rubric of a property model.
机译:从人权的角度来看,人类生物材料的不断发展的使用,包括其在生物库中的收集和保存以及它们在各种项目中的分配,是造成极大紧张的场所。在医疗法律环境中,这些权利通常是通过同意实践得到保护和实现的。在生物库环境中,人们对同意以及它的形成和部署的许多不同方式一直存在着广泛的关注。本文重新考虑了生物库设置中的同意,首先,探讨了同意的理论基础及其在更广泛的医学环境中的部署,其次,研究了生物库的性质和同意在其中的不舒适位置,最后,提供了一种方法来招募生物并保留在对原始人利益(包括人的尊严)敏感的生物库环境中,这是在财产模型的原则范围内进行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号