首页> 外文期刊>European journal of health law >Patient Mobility in Times of Austerity: A Legal and Policy Analysis of the Petru Case.
【24h】

Patient Mobility in Times of Austerity: A Legal and Policy Analysis of the Petru Case.

机译:紧缩时期的患者流动性:Petru案的法律和政策分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The case-law of the Court of Justice (ECJ) on patient mobility was recently challenged by a ruling that a patient could go to Germany for treatment when facilities in Romanian hospitals were inadequate. Given the reported impact of austerity measures in the field of health care this raises the question; what is the impact of the ECJ's ruling on how Member States can manage expenditure and limit outflows of patients and how should such measures be legally evaluated? The objective of this article is to analyse potential impact on health systems in the context of increasing pressure on public financing for health. While the ECJ mainly referred to the requirement of treatment in due time, we also analyse possible austerity reductions of the basket of care against the background of EU law (i.e., EGJ case-law, patient mobility directive, Charter of Fundamental rights and social security regulation).
机译:法院最近裁定,当罗马尼亚医院的设施不足时,患者可以去德国治疗,这对法院的判例法提出了质疑。鉴于紧缩措施在卫生保健领域据报道有影响,这就提出了一个问题;欧洲法院的裁决对会员国如何管理支出和限制患者外流有何影响?应如何对这些措施进行法律评估?本文的目的是在公共卫生筹资压力越来越大的背景下分析对卫生系统的潜在影响。尽管欧洲法院主要在适当时候提到了治疗要求,但我们还分析了在欧盟法律(例如,欧洲法院判例法,患者流动性指令,基本权利宪章和社会保障)的背景下,一揽子紧缩措施可能减少的情况。规)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号