...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of social psychology >Reciprocity in groups: Information-seeking in a public goods game
【24h】

Reciprocity in groups: Information-seeking in a public goods game

机译:团体互惠:在公共物品博弈中寻求信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Questions remain about the details of the reciprocal strategies people use in the context of group cooperation. Here we report an experiment in which participants in public goods games could access information about the lowest, median, or highest contribution to the public good before making their own contribution decisions. Results suggest that people have clear preferences for particular pieces of information and that information preferences vary systematically across individuals as a function of their contribution strategies. Specifically, participants playing reciprocal strategies sought information about the median contribution, free riders preferred to view the highest contribution, and altruists had inconsistent preferences. By including a treatment in which people could pay to see information rather than obtaining it for free, we found that people were willing to incur costs to acquire information, particularly those using a reciprocal strategy. Further adding a cost to view information decreased aggregate contributions, possibly because the motivation to induce others' reciprocal contributions diminished under these conditions. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:人们在小组合作中使用的对等策略的细节仍然存在疑问。在这里,我们报告了一项实验,在该实验中,公益游戏的参与者可以在做出自己的贡献决策之前访问有关对公共物品的最低,中位数或最高贡献的信息。结果表明,人们对特定信息有明确的偏好,并且信息偏好随个人的贡献策略而系统地变化。具体来说,参与对等策略的参与者寻求有关中位数贡献的信息,偏爱搭便车者倾向于查看最高贡献,并且利他主义者的偏好不一致。通过包含一种使人们可以付费查看信息而不是免费获取信息的处理方式,我们发现人们愿意承担获取信息的费用,尤其是那些采用互惠策略的信息。进一步增加查看信息的成本会降低总贡献,这可能是因为在这种情况下,诱导他人相互贡献的动机减弱了。版权所有(c)2007 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号