首页> 外文期刊>European journal of social psychology >Social comparison with friends versus non-friends
【24h】

Social comparison with friends versus non-friends

机译:与朋友和非朋友进行社交比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates whether several aspects of social comparison in school classes differ as a function of the type of relation between the student and his or her target. Participants were 9612 students in the first grade of secondary education in the Netherlands (equivalent to Grade 7 in the US). Results indicated that (1) 78% of the students who had at least one friend also compared with a friend; (2) social comparison with friends was much more often reciprocal than comparison with non- friends; (3) preferences for upward and downward comparison were less often given by students who compared with friends than students who compared with non- friends; (4) the similarity in initial performance level between students and their comparison targets was higher when targets were friends; (5) despite these differences, which seem to imply that friends often serve as routine standards whereas non friends are more deliberately chosen as comparison targets, it appeared that consequences of social comparison for subsequent performance were about the same for both types of relations. Further findings of this paper suggest that previously found effects of friends' grades on subsequent performance may be explained by social comparison.
机译:本文研究了学校课堂中社会比较的几个方面是否根据学生与其目标之间的关系类型而有所不同。参加者为9612名在荷兰接受初等教育的学生(相当于美国的7年级)。结果表明:(1)拥有至少一个朋友的学生中有78%的人也与朋友相比; (2)与朋友进行社交比较比与非朋友进行社交更容易。 (3)与朋友比较的学生比与非朋友比较的学生更倾向于上下比较。 (4)当目标是朋友时,学生和他们的比较目标在初始表现水平上的相似度更高; (5)尽管存在这些差异,这似乎暗示着朋友经常被当作常规标准,而非朋友被更刻意地选择为比较对象,但对于两种类型的关系而言,社会比较对随后表现的后果似乎是相同的。本文的进一步发现表明,先前发现的朋友成绩对随后表现的影响可以通过社会比较来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号