...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pain : >Acupuncture and dry needling in the management of myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
【24h】

Acupuncture and dry needling in the management of myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机译:针刺和干针刺治疗肌筋膜触发点疼痛:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pain from myofascial trigger points is often treated by needling, with or without injection, although evidence is inconclusive on whether this is effective. We aimed to review the current evidence on needling without injection, by conducting a systematic literature review. We searched electronic databases to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, and included studies where at least one group were treated by needling directly into the myofascial trigger points, and where the control was either no treatment, or usual care; indirect local dry needling or some form of placebo intervention. We extracted data on pain, using VAS scores as the standard. Seven studies were included. One study concluded that direct dry needling was superior to no intervention. Two studies, comparing direct dry needling to needling elsewhere in the muscle, produced contradictory results. Four studies used a placebo control and were included in a meta-analysis. Combining these studies (n=134), needling was not found to besignificantly superior to placebo (standardised mean difference, 14.9 [95%CI, -5.81 to 33.99]), however marked statistical heterogeneity was present (I(2)=88%). In conclusion, there is limited evidence deriving from one study that deep needling directly into myofascial trigger points has an overall treatment effect when compared with standardised care. Whilst the result of the meta-analysis of needling compared with placebo controls does not attain statistically significant, the overall direction could be compatible with a treatment effect of dry needling on myofascial trigger point pain. However, the limited sample size and poor quality of these studies highlights and supports the need for large scale, good quality placebo controlled trials in this area.
机译:肌筋膜触发点的疼痛通常通过注射或不注射进行针刺治疗,尽管尚无定论是否有效。我们的目的是通过进行系统的文献综述,以复习有关无针刺的最新证据。我们搜索了电子数据库以识别相关的随机对照试验,并纳入了以下研究:至少一组通过直接针刺入肌筋膜触发点进行了治疗,而对照要么为未治疗,要么为常规护理。间接局部干针刺或某种形式的安慰剂干预。我们以VAS分数为标准提取了有关疼痛的数据。包括七项研究。一项研究得出结论,直接干针刺优于无干预。两项直接干针刺与肌肉其他部位的针刺比较的研究得出了矛盾的结果。四项研究使用安慰剂对照,并纳入荟萃分析。结合这些研究(n = 134),未发现针刺明显优于安慰剂(标准化平均差异为14.9 [95%CI,-5.81至33.99]),但是存在明显的统计学异质性(I(2)= 88%) )。总之,一项研究得出的有限证据表明,与标准护理相比,直接深刺于肌筋膜触发点具有整体治疗效果。尽管与安慰剂对照相比,针刺的荟萃分析结果未达到统计学显着性,但总体方向可能与干针刺对肌筋膜触发点疼痛的治疗效果相符。但是,这些研究的样本量有限且质量差,这突出并支持了对该领域进行大规模,高质量安慰剂对照试验的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号