首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of three PCR-based assays for the non-invasive diagnosis of malaria: Detection of Plasmodium parasites in blood and saliva
【24h】

Comparison of three PCR-based assays for the non-invasive diagnosis of malaria: Detection of Plasmodium parasites in blood and saliva

机译:三种基于PCR的疟疾非侵入性诊断检测方法的比较:血液和唾液中疟原虫的检测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The conventional molecular diagnosis of malaria uses 18S rRNA-based PCR assay employing blood samples. This assay presents limitation in terms of long turnaround time and increased chances of false-positive results. Here, we evaluated one-step singleplex or multiplex PCR assay based on high copy species-specific consensus repeat sequences (CRS) along with standard 18S rRNA nested PCR (18S n-PCR) assay to detect P. falciparum and P. vivax infection using blood and saliva samples from Indian febrile patients. Out of 327 patients, 187 were found to be positive for malaria parasites by microscopic examination of peripheral blood smears. Among these 130 were P. vivax and 57 were P. falciparum cases. The18S n-PCR assay and CRS PCR assay identified 186 out of 187 cases (99.4 %). Multiplex CRS PCR assay detected Plasmodium in 176 out of 187 cases (94.1 %). Both singleplex and multiplex CRS PCR assay identified 6 mixed infection cases, while 18S n-PCR assay detected 10 mixed infection cases of P. vivax and P. falciparum, which were not recognized by microscopy. Non-invasive Plasmodium detection rate with DNA derived from saliva samples was highest for 18S n-PCR (87.36 %), followed by singleplex CRS (81 %) and multiplex CRS PCR assay (70.5 %). Specificity for P. vivax and P. falciparum detection for all assays was 98.48 % and 100 % respectively. Detection rate for P. vivax in saliva correlated with parasite density for CRS target-based assays. The species-specific CRS PCR, either as a singleplex or multiplex assay, can have an impact on diagnosis and epidemiological studies in malaria.
机译:疟疾的常规分子诊断使用血液样本基于18S rRNA的PCR分析。该测定法在周转时间长和假阳性结果的机会增加方面存在局限性。在这里,我们评估了基于高拷贝物种特异性共有重复序列(CRS)和标准18S rRNA巢式PCR(18S n-PCR)分析的单步单重或多重PCR分析,以检测恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫感染,印度发热患者的血液和唾液样本。通过显微镜检查外周血涂片,在327例患者中,发现187例疟原虫阳性。在这130例中,间日疟原虫和57例恶性疟原虫病例。 18S n-PCR分析和CRS PCR分析鉴定出187例病例中的186例(99.4%)。多重CRS PCR检测法在187例病例中的176例中检出了疟原虫(94.1%)。单重和多重CRS PCR检测均鉴定出6例混合感染病例,而18S n-PCR检测则检测到10例间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫的混合感染病例,这在显微镜下无法识别。 18S n-PCR对唾液样本DNA的无创性疟原虫检出率最高(87.36%),其次是单重CRS(81%)和多重CRS PCR分析(70.5%)。对于所有测定,间日疟原虫和恶性疟原虫检测的特异性分别为98.48%和100%。在基于CRS目标的检测中,唾液间日疟的检出率与寄生虫密度相关。作为单重或多重测定的物种特异性CRS PCR可能会对疟疾的诊断和流行病学研究产生影响。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号