...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Agronomy >A field study of the impact of different irrigation practices on herbicide leaching
【24h】

A field study of the impact of different irrigation practices on herbicide leaching

机译:田间研究不同灌溉方式对除草剂浸出的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Agricultural practices, such as subsurface drainage, irrigation and tillage, may significantly affect pesticide leaching and, consequently, the risk of groundwater contamination. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of different irrigation systems on herbicide leaching to shallow groundwater through direct monitoring at the field scale in northern Italy over a 3-year period. Concentrations of the herbicide terbuthylazine (TBA) and its metabolite desethylterbuthylazine (DES) were monitored on 10 farms cropped with maize and irrigated by sprinkler, basin and border systems. Considering the results grouped according to the different irrigation systems, the mean TBA and DES concentrations was lower than the arbitrary non-health based legal limit of 0.1og/L using sprinkler and border systems, while it was 0.19 and 0.30og/L respectively for TBA and DES using basin systems. However, since many factors other than the irrigation systems can contribute to pesticide leaching and in a field study it is impossible to discriminate between all the different variables, the concentrations of both compounds were simulated with and without irrigation using the model MACRO 5.1 in order to gain a deeper understanding of the role of irrigation on leaching. First, the groundwater table depth, which was measured daily in all fields, was used to calibrate the model and thus achieve a good soil hydrology calibration. To assess the performance of the model the root mean squared error (RMSE) was used. RMSE ranged from 0.2 to 0.5m, showing that a satisfactory hydrology calibration was obtained. Afterward, the solutes were modelled and the results showed that under non-irrigated conditions, concentrations of both compounds would be very low. These findings validate the hypothesis that careful selection of agricultural practices, such as the type of irrigation, can reduce pesticide leaching.
机译:地下排水,灌溉和耕作等农业实践可能会严重影响农药的淋洗,进而影响地下水的污染风险。本研究的目的是通过对意大利北部在三年内的田间规模进行直接监测,研究不同灌溉系统对除草剂向浅层地下水淋溶的影响。在10个种植了玉米并通过洒水器,盆地和边界系统灌溉的农场上,监测了除草剂丁丁嗪(TBA)及其代谢产物脱乙基丁噻嗪(DES)的浓度。考虑到根据不同灌溉系统分组的结果,使用洒水喷头和边界系统的平均TBA和DES浓度低于基于非健康的任意法定限值0.1og / L,而对于灌溉系统,则分别为0.19和0.30og / L使用盆地系统的TBA和DES。但是,由于除灌溉系统外的许多因素都可能导致农药浸出,并且在实地研究中不可能区分所有不同变量,因此使用MACRO 5.1模型在有灌溉和无灌溉条件下模拟了两种化合物的浓度,以便对灌溉在淋溶中的作用有更深入的了解。首先,每天在所有田地中测量的地下水位深度用于校准模型,从而实现良好的土壤水文校准。为了评估模型的性能,使用了均方根误差(RMSE)。 RMSE范围为0.2到0.5m,表明获得了令人满意的水文校准。之后,对溶质进行建模,结果表明在非灌溉条件下,两种化合物的浓度都非常低。这些发现证实了这样的假设,即精心选择农业实践(例如灌溉类型)可以减少农药的淋洗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号