首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions >Do lead markets for clean coal technology follow market demand? A case study for China, Germany, Japan and the US
【24h】

Do lead markets for clean coal technology follow market demand? A case study for China, Germany, Japan and the US

机译:清洁煤技术的主要市场是否跟随市场需求?中国,德国,日本和美国的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite high CO_2 emissions released by coal-fired energy production, coal will remain an important source of energy in coming decades. This case study explores the lead market status of China, Germany, Japan and the US for clean coal technologies. We concentrate on two existing technological standards: supercritical (SC) and ultra-supercritical (USC) pulverized coal technologies. In 1960s and 1970s, the US was a lead market for SC und USC technologies. During these decades, Japan was a lag market, but it surpassed the US in the early 1980s. Recently price and demand advantages began to shift to China. We conclude that lead market status may switch over time to markets with high growth rates, although first mover advantages may exist in non-lead markets for some R&D-intensive products, such as turbines. Less R&D-intensive products, such as boilers, are attractive as a basis for leapfrogging strategies, which many emerging countries have been successfully employing.
机译:尽管燃煤能源生产释放出大量的CO_2排放,但煤炭在未来几十年仍将是重要的能源。本案例研究探讨了中国,德国,日本和美国在清洁煤技术方面的领先市场地位。我们专注于两个现有技术标准:超临界(SC)和超超临界(USC)煤粉技术。在1960年代和1970年代,美国是SC和USC技术的领先市场。在这几十年中,日本是一个滞后市场,但在1980年代初超过了美国。最近,价格和需求优势开始转移到中国。我们得出的结论是,尽管某些研发密集型产品(例如涡轮机)在非铅市场中可能具有先发优势,但铅市场的地位可能会随着时间的流逝而转向高增长率市场。诸如锅炉之类的研发密集型产品作为跨越战略的基础很有吸引力,许多新兴国家已经成功地采用了跨越战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号