...
首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsy research >Bioequivalent antiepileptic drug switching and the risk of seizure-related events
【24h】

Bioequivalent antiepileptic drug switching and the risk of seizure-related events

机译:生物等效的抗癫痫药转换和癫痫发作相关事件的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are known to have a narrow therapeutic index. As a consequence, switching between bioequivalent AEDs remains controversial in the management of epilepsy. We investigated the association between A-rated switching of each class of currently available AED and emergent treatment for a seizure-related event. Methods: We used a case-control method and claims data from the 2010 to 2011 Truven Health MarketScan? Commercial Claims Database to estimate the risk of seizure following a medication switch. Cases and controls with an epilepsy diagnosis were identified by emergency/inpatient or outpatient visit claims, respectively. Cases and controls (N=9110) were matched 1:1 by age, epilepsy diagnosis category and seizure medication. The exposure was defined as a switch between A-rated AEDs during the 90 days prior to index date. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the association, adjusting for gender, baseline Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index (0, 1, 2, or 3+), region (Northeast, Central, South, and West), and total AED medications. Results: A switch between A-rated AEDs occurred in 1053 (23.2%) cases and 827 (18.1%) matched controls. The unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of a seizure-related event for switching were 1.38 (95% CI: 1.25-1.52) and 1.27 (95% CI: 1.14-1.41), respectively. The independent risk of an event also increased with each category increase in the Charlson score (CCI=1: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02-1.33; CCI=2: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.09-1.62; CCI=3+: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.64-2.41). Older AEDs had infrequent switches compared to newer agents and were not associated with events. Discussion: We found a modest association between AED switching and seizure-related events. Our analysis suggests that the behavior of switching alone may lead to seizure-related events regardless of the medication or type of switch. Other disease or environmental characteristics may contribute to this association. Based on these and other findings, health care professionals and patients should be cautious about switching bioequivalent AEDs.
机译:背景:已知较老的抗癫痫药(AED)具有较窄的治疗指数。因此,在癫痫的治疗中,在生物等效的AED之间切换仍然存在争议。我们调查了每类当前可用的AED的A级转换与癫痫发作相关事件的紧急治疗之间的关联。方法:我们采用了病例对照方法,并获得了2010年至2011年Truven Health MarketScan的索赔数据。商业索赔数据库可估计药物转换后癫痫发作的风险。分别通过急诊/住院或门诊就诊声明确定了具有癫痫病诊断的病例和对照。病例和对照组(N = 9110)按年龄,癫痫诊断类别和癫痫发作药物按1:1比例配对。暴露定义为指数日期前90天内A级AED之间的转换。使用条件对数回归来估计相关性,校正性别,基线Deyo-Charlson合并症指数(0、1、2或3+),区域(东北,中部,南部和西部)以及总AED药物。结果:在1053例(23.2%)病例和827例(18.1%)匹配的对照组中发生了A级AED之间的切换。癫痫相关事件的未调整和调整后的优势比分别为1.38(95%CI:1.25-1.52)和1.27(95%CI:1.14-1.41)。事件的独立风险也随Charlson评分的每个类别的增加而增加(CCI = 1:1.17,95%CI:1.02-1.33; CCI = 2:1.33,95%CI:1.09-1.62; CCI = 3 +: 1.99,95%CI:1.64-2.41)。与较新的代理相比,较旧的AED很少切换,并且与事件无关。讨论:我们发现AED转换与癫痫发作相关事件之间存在适度的关联。我们的分析表明,无论使用何种药物或使用何种开关,单独使用开关的行为都可能导致癫痫发作。其他疾病或环境特征也可能导致这种关联。基于这些发现和其他发现,医疗保健专业人员和患者在转换生物等效AED时应保持谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号