...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science and Pollution Research >Misuse of null hypothesis significance testing: Would estimation of positive and negative predictive values improve certainty of chemical risk assessment? (vol 20, pg 7341, 2013)
【24h】

Misuse of null hypothesis significance testing: Would estimation of positive and negative predictive values improve certainty of chemical risk assessment? (vol 20, pg 7341, 2013)

机译:无效假设重要性检验的误用:对正预测值和负预测值的估计会提高化学风险评估的确定性吗? (2013年第20卷,第7341页)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We argued recently that the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) are valuable metrics to include during null hypothesis significance testing: They inform the researcher about the probability of statistically significant and non-significant test outcomes actually being true. Although commonly misunderstood, a reported p value estimates only the probability of obtaining the results or more extreme results if the null hypothesis of no effect was true. Calculations of the more informative PPV and NPV require a priori estimate of the probability (R). The present document discusses challenges of estimating R.
机译:我们最近争论说,正预测值(PPV)和负预测值(NPV)是在无效假设显着性检验中包括的有价值的指标:它们告知研究人员统计上显着和非显着的检验结果确实为真的可能性。尽管通常被误解,但如果无效的无效假设为真,则报告的p值仅估计获得结果的可能性或更极端的结果。计算更多信息的PPV和NPV需要对概率(R)进行先验估计。本文讨论了估计R的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号