...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering failure analysis >Quantitative risk assessment of fire accidents of large-scale oil tanks triggered by lightning
【24h】

Quantitative risk assessment of fire accidents of large-scale oil tanks triggered by lightning

机译:雷电引发大型油罐起火事故的定量风险评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Severe fire accidents may be triggered by lightning strikes in large-scale oil tank areas. A methodology was proposed to quantitatively assess the fire risk. Based on previous relevant fire cases, three categories of fire accident scenarios are summarized: (A) fire accidents at the rim seal, (B) fire accidents above the floating roof and (C) fire accidents by perforation of the float pan. A generic event tree was built to present the process of fire development of oil tanks with the protection of a fire extinguishing system and a fire brigade. The probability models were proposed to calculate the probabilities of lightning strike, tank wall and floating roof damage/perforation, failure of the fire protection system and timely response of fire brigade. The application of the methodology to a case study provided the probabilities of different forms of accidents for three categories. According to the results of the case study, the probabilities of rim seal fire, local pool fire and full surface fire of large-scale oil tanks are 1.10 x 10(-2), 10(-8)-10(-6) and 2.17 x 10(-9), respectively, for Categories A and C, and the probabilities of rim seal fire, local pool fire and full surface fire of large-scale oil tanks are 4.99 x 10(-2), 10(-8)-10(-5) and 9.85 x 10(-8), respectively, for Category B. The fire risk by lightning for Category B is relatively higher, which could be reduced by improving the design of the float pan and enhancing the reliability of the components. Compared with the hazard of local pool fire and full surface fire, the risk of rim seal fire is unacceptable; in this case, an inert gas protection system can be introduced to reduce the risk. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在大型油箱区域,雷击可能会引发严重的火灾事故。提出了一种定量评估火灾风险的方法。根据以前的相关火灾案例,总结了三类火灾事故场景:(A)轮辋密封处的火灾事故,(B)浮顶上方的火灾事故和(C)浮子穿孔造成的火灾事故。建立了一个通用事件树,以表示油箱的火灾发展过程,并带有灭火系统和消防队。提出了概率模型来计算雷击,罐壁和浮顶损坏/穿孔,消防系统故障以及消防队及时响应的概率。该方法在案例研究中的应用提供了三类不同形式事故的可能性。根据案例研究的结果,大型油罐的边缘密封着火,局部水池着火和全表面着火的概率分别为1.10 x 10(-2),10(-8)-10(-6)和对于A类和C类,分别为2.17 x 10(-9),大型油罐的边缘密封着火,局部水池着火和全表面着火的概率分别为4.99 x 10(-2),10(-8) B类分别为)-10(-5)和9.85 x 10(-8)。B类的雷击火灾风险相对较高,可以通过改进浮盘的设计和增强可靠性来降低这种危险。的组件。与局部水池着火和全表面着火的危险相比,轮缘密封着火的危险是不可接受的;在这种情况下,可以引入惰性气体保护系统以降低风险。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号