首页> 外文期刊>Boundary-layer Meteorology >Evaluation of the Diurnal Cycle in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Over Land as Represented by a Variety of Single-Column Models: The Second GABLS Experiment
【24h】

Evaluation of the Diurnal Cycle in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Over Land as Represented by a Variety of Single-Column Models: The Second GABLS Experiment

机译:用各种单列模型表示的陆地大气边界层的日循环评估:第二个GABLS实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We present the main results from the second model intercomparison within the GEWEX (Global Energy and Water cycle Experiment) Atmospheric Boundary Layer Study (GABLS). The target is to examine the diurnal cycle over land in today's numerical weatherprediction and climate models for operational and research purposes. The set-up of the case is based on observations taken during the Cooperative Atmosphere-Surface Exchange Study-1999 (CASES-99), which was held in Kansas, USA in the early autumn with astrong diurnal cycle with no clouds present. The models are forced with a constant geostrophic wind, prescribed surface temperature and large-scale divergence. Results from 30 different model simulations and one large-eddy simulation (LES) are analyzed and compared with observations. Even though the surface temperature is prescribed, the models give variable near-surface air temperatures. This, in turn, gives rise to differences in low-level stability affecting the turbulence and the turbulent heat fluxes. The increase in modelled upward sensible heat flux during the morning transition is typically too weak and the growth of the convective boundary layer before noon is too slow. This is related to weak modelled nearsurface winds during the morning hours. The agreement between the models, the LES and observations is the best during the late afternoon. From this intercomparison study, we find that modelling the diurnal cycle is still a big challenge. For the convective part of the diurnal cycle, some ofthe first-order schemes perform somewhat better while the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) schemes tend to be slightly better during nighttime conditions. Finer vertical resolution tends to improve results to some extent, but is certainly not the solutionto all the deficiencies identified.
机译:我们介绍了GEWEX(全球能源和水循环实验)大气边界层研究(GABLS)中第二个模型比较的主要结果。目的是为了操作和研究目的,检查当今数字天气预报和气候模型中陆地上的昼夜周期。该案例的设置基于1999年秋天在美国堪萨斯举行的“大气-地表交换合作研究-1999”(CASES-99)期间的观察结果,昼夜周期强,无云。这些模型受恒定的地转风,规定的地表温度和大范围发散的影响。分析了来自30个不同模型仿真和一个大涡流仿真(LES)的结果,并将其与观察结果进行了比较。即使规定了表面温度,这些模型也会给出可变的近地表空气温度。反过来,这引起了影响湍流和湍流热通量的低水平稳定性的差异。早晨过渡期间建模的向上感热通量的增加通常太弱,中午之前对流边界层的增长太慢。这与早晨时段模拟的近地表风弱有关。模型,LES和观测值之间的一致性在下午晚些时候是最好的。通过这项比较研究,我们发现对日循环进行建模仍然是一个很大的挑战。对于昼夜周期的对流部分,某些一级方案在夜间条件下表现较好,而湍流动能(TKE)方案则趋于稍好一些。更好的垂直分辨率往往会在某种程度上改善结果,但肯定不能解决所有已发现的缺陷。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号