【24h】

Seismic upgrading of structures with different retrofitting methods

机译:用不同的改造方法对结构进行抗震升级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents an analytical study aimed at evaluating the seismic performance of steel moment resisting frames (MRFs) retrofitted with different approaches. For this, 3, 6 and 12 storey MRFs having four equal bays of 5 m were selected as the case study models. The models were designed with lateral stiffness insufficient to satisfy code drift and hinge limitations in zones with high seismic hazard. Three different retrofit strategies including traditional diagonal bracing system and energy dissipation devices such as buckling restrained braces and viscoelastic dampers were used for seismic upgrading of the existing structures. In the nonlinear time history analysis, a set of ground motions representative of the design earthquake with 10% exceedance probability in fifty years was taken into consideration. Considering the local and global deformations, the results in terms of inter-storey drift index, global damage index, plastic hinge formations, base shear demand and roof drift time history were compared. It was observed that both buckling-restrained braces and viscoelastic dampers allowed for an efficient reduction in the demands of the upgraded frames as compared to traditional braces.
机译:本文提出了旨在评估采用不同方法改造的钢制抗弯框架(MRF)的抗震性能的分析研究。为此,选择了3个,6个和12层具有四个等间隔5 m的MRF作为案例研究模型。这些模型设计的横向刚度不足以满足地震高发地区的代码漂移和铰链限制。现有结构的抗震升级采用了三种不同的改造策略,包括传统的斜撑系统和消能装置,例如屈曲约束支撑和粘弹性阻尼器。在非线性时程分析中,考虑了代表设计地震的一组地震动,该地震动在五十年内超出概率为10%。考虑局部和整体变形,比较了层间漂移指数,整体破坏指数,塑性铰铰形成,基础剪力需求和屋顶漂移时间历程的结果。观察到,与传统的支撑相比,屈曲约束的支撑和粘弹性阻尼器都可以有效地降低升级后框架的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号