...
首页> 外文期刊>Educational studies in mathematics >Book review: Pausing to relate and participate Mathematical relationships in education: identities and participation. Edited by Laura Black, Heather Mendick, & Yvette Solomon (2009). New York, NY: Routledge. Hardback: ISBN: 978-0-415-99684-6. List Price:
【24h】

Book review: Pausing to relate and participate Mathematical relationships in education: identities and participation. Edited by Laura Black, Heather Mendick, & Yvette Solomon (2009). New York, NY: Routledge. Hardback: ISBN: 978-0-415-99684-6. List Price:

机译:书评:暂停联系和参与教育中的数学关系:身份和参与。由劳拉·布莱克(Laura Black),希瑟·门迪克(Heather Mendick)和伊薇特·所罗门(Yvette Solomon)编辑(2009年)。纽约,纽约:Routledge。精装本:ISBN:978-0-415-99684-6。价格表:

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There was a time, not so long ago, when the selection of a textbook for use in graduate level courses in mathematics curriculum presented me with many challenges indeed. I value research-based texts comprised of multiple authors, each embracing different methodological and/or theoretical lenses through which to view mathematics education and research in/on mathematics education. What I found more often in my searches, however, were books that focused narrowly on (mostly) cognitive and/or psychological perspectives on learning, while working hard to de-emphasize theory and associated academic language. The significant impact of such books on the field of mathematics education is not in question; their narrowness of focus, however, tends to limit opportunities for resonance and relationship on the part of the students in my courses (who are generally full-time school teachers from diverse backgrounds and interests, studying part-time in graduate school). Thankfully, those days of limited choice have passed. In recent years, books that challenge monolithic, atheoretical, and empiricist views of mathematics teaching, learning, and research have been published in notable numbers (see, for example, Allen & Johnston-Wilder, 2004; Brown, 2008; de Freitas & Nolan, 2008; Valero & Zevenbergen, 2004; Walshaw, 2004, 2010). This book edited by Black, Mendick, and Solomon is another such choice; it is, in fact, a treasure in how its chapters engage the reader in multiple methodological and theoretical conversations in/ on mathematical relationships, identities, and participations by key researchers in the field.
机译:不久前,有一段时间,一本用于数学课程研究生课程的教科书的选择确实给我带来了许多挑战。我重视由多位作者组成的基于研究的教科书,每位作者都采用不同的方法论和/或理论视角来查看数学教育和/或从事数学教育研究。但是,我在搜索中经常发现的是那些狭on地集中于(主要是)关于学习的认知和/或心理学观点的书,同时努力不去强调理论和相关的学术语言。这些书对数学教育领域的重大影响是毋庸置疑的。但是,他们关注的范围狭窄,往往会限制我课程中学生的共鸣和联系的机会(他们通常是来自不同背景和兴趣的专职学校教师,在研究生院学习兼职)。幸运的是,那些选择有限的日子已经过去了。近年来,对数学教学,学习和研究的整体性,理论性和经验主义观点提出质疑的书籍数量惊人(例如,见Allen&Johnston-Wilder,2004; Brown,2008; de Freitas&Nolan ,2008; Valero和Zevenbergen,2004; Walshaw,2004,2010)。布莱克,门迪克和所罗门编辑的这本书是另一种选择。实际上,它是本书各章如何吸引读者参与有关数学关系,身份和该领域主要研究人员的参与的多种方法和理论对话的宝库。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号