首页> 外文期刊>Ecology, Environment and Conservation >Growth, yield components, and yield of Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as Influenced by irrigation methods and nutrient levels
【24h】

Growth, yield components, and yield of Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as Influenced by irrigation methods and nutrient levels

机译:灌溉方式和养分水平对Bt棉花(陆地棉)的生长,产量构成和产量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A field experiment was carried out during kharif season of 2009-'10 at Agriculture College Farm, Bheemarayanagudi, Karnataka (India), to study the response of Bt cotton to different irrigation methods and nutrient levels. The growth parameters such asplant height, number of monopodial branches per plant, sympodial branches per plant, total dry matter production, leaf area per plant and leaf area index (LAI) were, significantly influenced by different irrigation methods and nutrient levels. Among theirrigation methods conventional furrow method of irrigation, and among fertilizer levels 125 per cent RDF resulted significantly higher growth components. Yield components such as number of bolls per plant, mean boll weight and seed cotton yield per plant (58.52, 4.11 g and, 147.77 g plant'respectively) were significantly superior with conventional furrow irrigation method. Among different fertilizer levels, 125 per cent of the recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) recorded significantly higher seed cotton yield per hectare (2591 kg ha~(-1)), seed cotton yield per plant (143.33 plant~(-1)), mean boll weight (3.73 g), number of bolls per plant (57.34), over 100 per cent and 75 per cent of RDF. Among the irrigation methods conventional furrow irrigationhas shown significantly higher seed cotton yield (2466 kg ha~(-1)) compared to alternatively alternate furrow irrigation (AAFI) (2313 kg ha~(-1)) and alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) (2233 kg ha~(-1)). However, it was on par with alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) + mulching (2387 kg ha~(-1)). Conventional furrow irrigation with 125 per cent RDF recorded significantly higher gross returns and net returns (79,090 and 54, 058 Rs. ha~(-1), respectively) compared to 100 per cent RDF (74, 470 and 50, 247 Rs. ha~(-1), respectively) and 75 per cent RDF (68, 390 and 45, 027 Rs. ha~(-1), respectively).
机译:在印度卡纳塔克邦Bheemarayanagudi农业学院农场的2009-10年度卡里夫季节进行了田间试验,以研究Bt棉花对不同灌溉方式和养分水平的响应。不同的灌溉方式和养分水平显着影响植物的生长参数,如植物高度,单株单足类分枝数,单株共生分枝,总干物质产量,单株叶面积和叶面积指数(LAI)。在其灌溉方法中,常规的沟row灌溉方法以及化肥含量中,RDF的125%导致生长成分明显增加。与常规沟灌法相比,产量组成(例如每株铃的数量,平均铃重和每株种子棉的产量)分别更高(分别为58.52、4.11 g和147.77 g)。在不同的肥料水平中,建议的肥料剂量(RDF)的125%记录表明每公顷的籽棉产量(2591 kg ha〜(-1)),每株植物的籽棉产量(143.33 plant〜(-1))高得多。 ,平均铃重(3.73 g),单株铃数(57.34),RDF的100%和75%以上。在常规灌溉方法中,常规沟灌显示出比交替耕种灌溉(AAFI)(2313 kg ha〜(-1))和交替耕种灌溉(AFI)高的籽棉产量(2466 kg ha〜(-1))( 2233公斤ha〜(-1))。但是,它与交替沟灌(AFI)+覆盖(2387 kg ha〜(-1))相当。相对于100%RDF(74、470和50、247 Rs.ha),常规RDF为125%的犁沟灌溉的总收益和净收益(分别为79,090和54,058 Rs。ha〜(-1))高得多。 〜(-1)和RDF的75%(分别为68、390和45、027 Rs。ha〜(-1))。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号