首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Modelling >Remote sensing of crop production in China by production efficiency models: models comparisons, estimates and uncertainties
【24h】

Remote sensing of crop production in China by production efficiency models: models comparisons, estimates and uncertainties

机译:生产效率模型对中国农作物产量的遥感:模型比较,估计和不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Regional estimates or prediction of crop production is critical for many applications such as agricultural lands management, food security warning system, food trade policy and carbon cycle research. Remote sensing offers great potential for regional production monitoring and estimates, yet uncertainties associated with are rarely addressed. Moreover, although crops are one of critical biomes in global carbon cycle research, few evidences are available on the performance of global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP) in estimating regional crop NPP. In this study, we use high quality weather and crop data to calibrate model parameter. validate and compare two kinds of remote sensing based production efficiency models, i.e. the Carnegie-Ames-Stan ford-Approach (CASA) and Global Production Efficiency Model Version 2.0 (GLO-PEM2), in estimating maize production across China. Results show that both models intend to underestimate maize yields, although they also overestimate maize yields much at some regions. There are no significant differences between the results from CASA and GLO-PEM2 models in terms of both estimated production and spatial pattern. CASA model simulates better in the areas with dense crop and weather data for calibration. Otherwise GLO-PEM2 model does better. Whether the water soil-moisture down-regulator is used or not should depend on the percent of irrigation lands at the regions. The improved and validated models can be used for many applications. Further improvement can be expected by increasing remote sensing image resolution and the number of surface data stations. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:作物产量的区域估计或预测对于许多应用至关重要,例如农业土地管理,粮食安全预警系统,粮食贸易政策和碳循环研究。遥感为区域生产监测和估计提供了巨大潜力,但很少解决与之相关的不确定性。此外,尽管农作物是全球碳循环研究中的关键生物群落之一,但关于陆地净初级生产力(NPP)的全球模型在估算区域农作物NPP方面的性能的证据很少。在这项研究中,我们使用高质量的天气和作物数据来校准模型参数。验证和比较两种基于遥感的生产效率模型,即卡内基-艾姆斯-斯坦·福特方法(CASA)和全球生产效率模型2.0版(GLO-PEM2),以估算中国的玉米产量。结果表明,这两种模型都意图低估玉米单产,尽管它们在某些地区也高估了玉米单产。就估计的产量和空间格局而言,CASA和GLO-PEM2模型的结果之间没有显着差异。 CASA模型在作物和天气数据密集的地区进行更好的模拟,以进行校准。否则,GLO-PEM2模型会更好。是否使用水土水分下调剂应取决于该地区灌溉土地的百分比。经过改进和验证的模型可以用于许多应用程序。通过增加遥感影像的分辨率和地面数据站的数量,可以期待进一步的改善。 (c)2004 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号