首页> 外文期刊>Ecological informatics: an international journal on ecoinformatics and computational ecology >Metabolism analysis and eco-environmental impact assessment of two typical cement production systems in Chinese enterprises
【24h】

Metabolism analysis and eco-environmental impact assessment of two typical cement production systems in Chinese enterprises

机译:中国企业两种典型水泥生产系统的代谢分析和生态环境影响评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As one of the primary raw materials in the construction industry, cement production consumes a great deal of resources and has various environmental effects. During the production phase in particular, different procedures play a decisive role in determining the input and output. China has become both the largest producer and the largest consumer of cement worldwide. Together, the two most common production processes in China, the shaft kiln and the NSP (New Suspension Preheater) kiln, account for more than 95% of total production capacity. Although the proportion of NSP kilns continues to increase each year, shaft kilns are still adopted innumerous small and medium-sized enterprises due to their lower costs and quick yields. During the period of technical transformation and the emergence of continuous environmental issues, it is of great importance to quantify the metabolic processes of typical construction materials, particularly in order to conduct a comparative analysis with different production techniques. However, due to the limited availability of data, relevant studies are rare. In this paper, two typical cement enterprises with different production processes were selected in order to investigate material and energy use as well as pollutant emissions. Metabolic processes were then compared and a use efficiency analysis for different procedural phases was conducted using material flow analysis (MFA). The results are as follows: the shaft kiln requires more raw materials, such as limestone, clay, and coal, per unit product The efficiency of energy consumption (including electric power consumption and overall energy consumption) is also lower for the shaft kiln than for the NSP kiln. As for environmental emissions, the shaft kiln emits more SO2, CO2, NOX, and dust per unit product than the NSP kiln and has higher eco-environmental impacts. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:作为建筑业的主要原材料之一,水泥生产消耗大量资源,并具有各种环境影响。特别是在生产阶段,不同的程序在确定输入和输出时起决定性作用。中国已成为全球最大的水泥生产国和最大消费国。在中国,两种最常见的生产工艺-竖窑和NSP(新悬浮式预热器)窑,占总产能的95%以上。尽管NSP窑的比例逐年增加,但由于成本低,产量高,竖井窑仍被众多中小企业所采用。在技​​术改造和持续的环境问题出现期间,对典型建筑材料的代谢过程进行量化非常重要,特别是为了使用不同的生产技术进行比较分析。但是,由于数据有限,相关研究很少。本文选择了两个生产工艺不同的典型水泥企业来调查材料和能源的使用以及污染物的排放。然后比较代谢过程,并使用物料流分析(MFA)进行不同程序阶段的使用效率分析。结果如下:立窑每单位产品需要更多的原材料,例如石灰石,粘土和煤。立窑的能耗(包括电耗和总能耗)效率也比立窑低。 NSP窑。在环境排放方面,竖窑每单位产品排放的SO2,CO2,NOX和粉尘比NSP窑多,对生态环境的影响更大。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号