首页> 外文期刊>Ecological restoration >Stream Ecosystem Restoration: Is Watershed-Scale Treatment Effective Without Instream Habitat Rehabilitation?
【24h】

Stream Ecosystem Restoration: Is Watershed-Scale Treatment Effective Without Instream Habitat Rehabilitation?

机译:溪流生态系统的恢复:流域规模的处理在没有溪流栖息地恢复的情况下是否有效?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many researchers have written that the integrity of stream ecosystems is governed by watershed-level landscape variables, such as geology and land use (Hynes 1975, Roth and others 1996, Allan and others 1997, Schlosser 2002), while others have coined the term "river-scape" to emphasize the role of landscape-scale variables in stream ecosystems (Fausch and others 2002). Accordingly, some researchers and practitioners prefer a "passive approach" to stream restoration. This method consists of halting anthropogenic practices and process disturbances that prevent recovery, while suggesting that reach-scale manipulations are typically ineffective (Beschta and others 1994). Others admit the dual importance of reach- and watershed-scale influences, but emphasize the importance of processes acting at larger spatial scales (Roth and others 1996, Wissmar and Beschta 1998). They favor the restoration of functional processes rather than forms (for example, restoring conditions leading to island formation as opposed to constructing islands with equipment) (Ward and others 2002).
机译:许多研究人员写道,河流生态系统的完整性受流域级景观变量控制,例如地质和土地利用(Hynes 1975,Roth等,1996; Allan等,1997; Schlosser 2002),而其他人则创造了“河流景观”以强调景观尺度变量在河流生态系统中的作用(Fausch等人,2002)。因此,一些研究人员和从业人员更喜欢“被动方法”来进行流修复。这种方法包括停止人为操作和阻止恢复的过程干扰,同时表明达到范围的操作通常无效(Beschta等1994)。其他人则承认影响范围和分水岭规模的影响的双重重要性,但强调在更大的空间尺度上起作用的过程的重要性(Roth等人,1996; Wissmar和Beschta,1998)。他们赞成恢复功能过程而不是形式(例如,恢复导致形成岛屿的条件,而不是用设备建造岛屿)(Ward等人,2002)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号