首页> 外文期刊>Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science >EXAMINING OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZER USE LEVELS IN TERMSOF AGRICULTURE ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS AND ECONOMIC LOSSES IN THE AGRICULTURAL FARMS: THE CASE OF ISPARTA, TURKEY
【24h】

EXAMINING OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZER USE LEVELS IN TERMSOF AGRICULTURE ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS AND ECONOMIC LOSSES IN THE AGRICULTURAL FARMS: THE CASE OF ISPARTA, TURKEY

机译:在农业环境中检查农业环境关系和经济损失期间的化肥使用水平:以土耳其伊斯帕塔为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the study was to investigate the chemical fertilizer use levels of grown crops in Isparta province, Turkey and economic loses because of excessive fertilizer used by comparing of fertilizer amount recommended by Agricultural Research Institute and farmer's fertilizer application. In addition, in this study was examined the levels of awareness on the fertilizing of farmers and discussed about negative effects of excessive fertilizer use on environment. Data were obtained by conducting a questionnaire with 100 farms selected by stratified random sampling method. The result indicates that there was no effective and balanced fertilizing in the examined area. Fertilizing without taking into account the results of soil analysis was common in research area. This situation shows that farmers haven't sufficient knowledge on the fertilizing. The level of farmers' environmental awareness was low. It was determined that farmers were used more fertilizer than recommended by Agricultural Research Institute. Economic losses due to excessive fertilizer usage in apple, barley, wheat, cherry, chick pea, sour cherry, peach, apricot, rose, sugar beet, poppy seed, tomato, green lentil were between 1.00-137.24 TL ha~(-1). Economic losses due to extra fertilizer use was 57.90 TL ha~(-1) and total economic losses were 27 751.17 TL (1 USD=1.34). Economic loss ratios for every crop type were 64.51% for apple, 16.02% for barley, 11.01% for wheat, 4.10% for sugar beet 1.52 % for cherry and 2.84% for other crops.As a result, it can be said that soil analysis should be compulsory for all farmers. The extension staff should make more emphasis on education the farming community about the recommended doses, time and method of application to every grown crop. Fertilizer recommendations should be made taking into consideration possible environmental effects.
机译:该研究的目的是通过比较农业研究所推荐的肥料用量和农民的肥料施用量,调查土耳其伊斯巴达省种植的农作物的化学肥料使用量以及因过量肥料而造成的经济损失。此外,在这项研究中,考察了对农民施肥的认识水平,并讨论了过量使用肥料对环境的负面影响。数据是通过对采用分层随机抽样方法选择的100个农场进行问卷调查而获得的。结果表明在所检查的区域没有有效和均衡的施肥。不考虑土壤分析结果的施肥在研究领域很普遍。这种情况表明农民对施肥知识不足。农民的环保意识水平低。确定农民使用的肥料比农业研究所推荐的更多。苹果,大麦,小麦,樱桃,鹰嘴豆,酸樱桃,桃,杏,玫瑰,甜菜,罂粟种子,番茄,绿扁豆因过量使用肥料而造成的经济损失在1.00-137.24 TL ha〜(-1)之间。由于额外使用化肥而造成的经济损失为57.90 TL ha〜(-1),总经济损失为27 751.17 TL(1美元= 1.34)。每种作物的经济损失率分别为:苹果64.51%,大麦16.02%,小麦11.11%,甜菜4.10%,樱桃1.52%,其他作物2.84%。对所有农民都是强制性的。推广人员应更加重视对农业社区进行有关推荐剂量,时间和每种农作物施用方法的教育。肥料的建议应考虑到可能的环境影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号