首页> 外文期刊>International journal of nursing studies >A systematic review: The effects of orientation programs for cancer patients and their family/carers
【24h】

A systematic review: The effects of orientation programs for cancer patients and their family/carers

机译:系统评价:定向项目对癌症患者及其家人/护理人员的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To assess the effects of information interventions which orient patients and their carers/family to a cancer care facility and the services available within the facility. Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs and quasi-RCTs. Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Methods: We included studies evaluating the effect of an orientation intervention, compared with a control group which received usual care, or with trials comparing one orientation intervention with another orientation intervention. Results: Four RCTs of 610 participants met the criteria for inclusion. Findings from two RCTs demonstrated significant benefits of the orientation intervention in relation to reduced levels of distress (mean difference (MD): -8.96, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): -11.79 to -6.13), but non-significant benefits in relation to the levels state anxiety levels (MD -9.77) (95%CI: -24.96 to 5.41). There are insufficient data on the other outcomes of interest. Conclusions: This review has demonstrated the feasibility and some potential benefits of orientation interventions. There was a low level of evidence to suggest that orientation interventions can reduce distress in patients. However, other outcomes, including patient knowledge recall/satisfaction, remain inconclusive. The majority of trials were subjected to high risk of bias and were likely to be insufficiently powered. Further well conducted and powered RCTs are required to provide evidence for determining the most appropriate intensity, nature, mode and resources for such interventions. Patient and carer-focused outcomes should be included.
机译:目标:评估信息干预的效果,这些信息干预将患者及其护理者/家人定向到癌症护理机构以及该机构内提供的服务。设计:随机对照试验(RCT),整群RCT和准RCT的系统评价。数据来源:MEDLINE,CINAHL,PsycINFO,EMBASE和对照试验的Cochrane中央寄存器。方法:我们纳入了评估定向干预效果的研究,与接受常规护理的对照组相比,或将一种定向干预与另一种定向干预进行比较的试验。结果:610名参与者的四项RCT符合纳入标准。来自两个RCT的结果表明,定向干预相对于降低痛苦水平具有显着优势(平均差异(MD):-8.96,95%置信区间(95%CI):-11.79至-6.13),但无显着优势状态焦虑水平(MD -9.77)(95%CI:-24.96至5.41)。关于其他感兴趣结果的数据不足。结论:这篇综述证明了定向干预的可行性和一些潜在的好处。很少有证据表明定向干预可以减轻患者的痛苦。但是,其他结局,包括患者知识的回忆/满意度,仍不确定。大多数试验都存在偏见的高风险,并且可能没有足够的能力。还需要性能良好且功能强大的RCT,以提供证据来确定此类干预措施的最适当强度,性质,方式和资源。应包括以患者和照顾者为重点的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号