...
首页> 外文期刊>International Legal Materials >INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: PROSECUTOR V. THOMAS LUBANGA DYILO, JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 74 OF THE STATUTE AND DECISION ON SENTENCE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 76 OF THE STATUTE
【24h】

INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: PROSECUTOR V. THOMAS LUBANGA DYILO, JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 74 OF THE STATUTE AND DECISION ON SENTENCE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 76 OF THE STATUTE

机译:国际刑事法院序言:检察长V. THOMAS LUBANGA DYILO,根据《规约》第74条作出的判决以及根据《规约》第76条作出的判决的决定

获取原文
           

摘要

The first-ever judgment from the International Criminal Court ("ICC") is a tome that has made history, built off history, and provides direction for the future of the world's first permanent court of international criminal justice. The judgment and sentencing decision in Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo provide important jurisprudence on modes of liability and on the war crimes of conscripting and enlisting children under the age of fifteen into armed groups and using them to actively participate in military hostilities. However, the trial, which lasted six years, was marred by controversy that demonstrates the ICC's growing pains. These troubles are evident in the judgment and sentencing decision, with the Chamber strongly chastising the prosecution for how it handled its investigation and for its controversial decision to limit the charges against Lubanga to just the issue of child soldiers. These developments and challenges will be discussed below, before turning to a discussion of the subsequent sentencing decision.
机译:国际刑事法院(“ ICC”)作出的第一项判决,是一部创造历史,巩固历史并为世界上第一个国际刑事司法常设法院的未来提供方向的书刊。检察官诉托马斯·卢班加·迪伊洛(Thomas Lubanga Dyilo)案中的判决和判刑判决,对赔偿责任模式以及征召和招募15岁以下儿童加入武装团体并利用他们积极参加军事敌对行动的战争罪提供了重要的判例。然而,这场历时六年的审判因争议而败笔,这表明了国际刑事法院日益加重的痛苦。这些麻烦在判决和量刑决定中显而易见,分庭强烈谴责起诉方如何处理调查,以及有争议的决定,将针对鲁班加的指控仅限于童兵问题。在讨论后续量刑决定之前,将在下面讨论这些发展和挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号