【24h】

Incentives, coordination and learning in government-sponsored vs. spontaneous inter-firm research cooperation

机译:政府资助与自发企业间研究合作的激励,协调与学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Our paper is a primary attempt at characterising two types of inter-firm agreements from a micro-analytical perspective: publicly funded collaborations stimulated by research and development government programmes vs. spontaneous, privately funded joint research projects. Using a three-dimensional grid in terms of incentives, coordination and learning, we Suggest that the two organisational modes show rather contrasted features: government-sponsored agreements generally concern peripheral activities, submit to predefined coordination rules and favour exploratory, unilateral learning, whereas spontaneous alliances focus on more critical activities, create their own operating rules and may - sometimes - activate an interactive learning which generates valuable, collective, specific assets. These two idealised collaborative patterns also lead to different evolution scenarios, the former being more stable than the latter in the short run, but also less persistent in the long run in case of success. The theoretical propositions are illustrated through two case studies in the emerging, fuel-cell technology.
机译:本文是从微观分析的角度描述两种类型的公司间协议的主要尝试:受研发政府计划刺激的公共资助合作与自发,私人资助的联合研究项目。我们从激励,协调和学习的角度使用三维网格,我们认为这两种组织模式表现出截然不同的特征:政府赞助的协议通常涉及外围活动,服从预先定义的协调规则并倾向于探索性,单方面学习,而自发性联盟专注于更关键的活动,创建自己的操作规则,有时可能会激活交互式学习,从而产生有价值的,集体的,特定的资产。这两种理想化的协作模式也导致了不同的发展场景,前者在短期内比后者更稳定,但从长远来看,如果成功,则持久性会降低。理论命题通过新兴的燃料电池技术中的两个案例研究得以说明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号