...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of technology and design education >Enhanced and conventional project-based learning in an engineering design module
【24h】

Enhanced and conventional project-based learning in an engineering design module

机译:工程设计模块中基于常规项目的增强型学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Engineering education focuses chiefly on students' ability to solve problems. While most engineering students are proficient in solving paper questions, they may not be proficient at providing optimal solutions to pragmatic project-based problems that require systematic learning strategy, innovation, problem-solving, and execution. The present study aims to determine whether an enhanced Project-based learning (PBL) with appropriate innovative interventions leads to increased students' ability to achieve better learning and project outcomes. The interventions refer to incorporating added learning and facilitating methods, namely, (1) use of mind-maps; (2) employment of analogies; and (3) use of round-table discussions. The study was conducted with a total number of 60 first-time PBL students equally divided into two classes with one serving as an experimental class and another as a control class. In addition, one class of students had a lower academic standing compared to the other (control). The rubric for the project-based module included a written knowledge test and a scenario-based oral examination to test knowledge and problem-solving skills, a artefact demonstration to evaluate artefact's performance. A major finding of this study was that there were significant differences in knowledge scores, problem-solving ability and artefact performance between students undergoing conventional and enhanced PBL methods. It could also be inferred from this study that students who had undergone enhanced PBL method designed better systems and had better performing artefacts than those who were subjected to the conventional PBL approach. Finally, it was concluded that incorporating enhanced learning and facilitating methods to group-centric, project-based driven education provided a more fertile environment to promote better learning experience and improved problem-solving ability which could eventually lead to developing innovative and pragmatic solutions to real-world engineering problems.
机译:工程教育主要关注学生解决问题的能力。尽管大多数工程专业的学生精通解决纸质问题,但他们可能不擅长为需要系统学习策略,创新,问题解决和执行的,基于务实项目的问题提供最佳解决方案。本研究旨在确定采用适当的创新干预措施来增强基于项目的学习(PBL)是否可以提高学生获得更好的学习和项目成果的能力。干预是指结合增加的学习和促进方法,即(1)使用思维导图; (2)使用类比; (3)使用圆桌讨论。这项研究是针对60名首次参加PBL的学生而进行的,他们平均分为两个班级,一个班是实验班,另一个是对照组。此外,一班学生的学业成绩低于另一班(对照组)。基于项目的模块的主题包括:书面知识测试和基于场景的口头考试,以测试知识和解决问题的能力,以及用于评估文物性能的文物演示。这项研究的主要发现是,在接受常规和增强PBL方法的学生之间,知识得分,解决问题的能力和手工艺品的性能存在显着差异。从这项研究中还可以推断出,与使用传统PBL方法的学生相比,经历了增强PBL方法的学生设计了更好的系统,并且具有更好的伪像效果。最后,得出的结论是,将增强的学习和促进方法纳入以小组为中心,基于项目的教育中,可以提供更肥沃的环境,以促进更好的学习体验和提高的解决问题的能力,最终可能导致开发出针对实际情况的创新且务实的解决方案。世界工程问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号