首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping >Comparison between different design approaches to prevent buckling of torispherical heads under internal pressure
【24h】

Comparison between different design approaches to prevent buckling of torispherical heads under internal pressure

机译:防止内压下球形圆头屈曲的不同设计方法之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Under the action of internal pressure compressive circumferential stresses develop in the knuckle region of torispherical heads making them susceptible to buckling. Current pressure vessel design codes such as the European Unfired pressure vessel code MSA EN13445 Part 3 present buckling as a failure mode that needs to be prevented. The latest version of the code has a Design by Analysis route that requires the designer to perform a buckling check on the design model. This study considers the different design approaches (Design by Analysis and Design by Rule) presented in MSA EN13445 Part 3 and compares computational results with experimental data available from literature. The study shows that the pressure vessel design code MSA EN13445 Part 3 guarantees that the calculated design load will not subject torispherical heads to buckling in the knuckle region, under the action of internal pressure.
机译:在内部压力的作用下,在球形头的转向节区域中产生压缩周向应力,从而使其易于屈曲。当前的压力容器设计规范(例如,欧洲未燃压力容器规范MSA EN13445第3部分)将屈曲作为一种需要防止的故障模式。该代码的最新版本具有“按分析设计”路线,该路线要求设计人员对设计模型执行屈曲检查。本研究考虑了MSA EN13445第3部分中介绍的不同设计方法(按分析设计和按规则设计),并将计算结果与可从文献中获得的实验数据进行了比较。研究表明,压力容器设计规范MSA EN13445第3部分保证,在内部压力的作用下,计算得出的设计载荷将不会使球形球头在转向节区域内屈曲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号