首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping >Study on analogy between dynamic load and displacement-controlled load
【24h】

Study on analogy between dynamic load and displacement-controlled load

机译:动载荷与位移控制载荷的类比研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Difficulties in handling dynamic load with elastic-plastic analysis and/or structural component test significantly exist in the field of R&D for seismic resistive nuclear pipe systems. In previous studies, the analyses and the structural tests were conducted statically. Many of them have been suggesting conservativeness included in the current seismic criterion of the nuclear design code. Therefore, if analogy between the earthquake load and static displacement are proved, it should bring possibility of more reasonable criterion. The author studied analogy between dynamic load and static displacement using FEM analysis with elastic beam model and elastic-plastic shell model of an elbow. First, the dynamic load equivalent to 160% of ASME/JSME Code's Level D limit was defined using the elastic beam model. Next, the defined dynamic load was given to the elastic-plastic shell model to acquire the nonlinear behaviors such as the relative displacement trend and the plastic strain accumulation at crown of the elbow. Then, three cases of cyclic displacement trends, Case 1, 2 and 3, were defined base on the dynamic analysis results and given to the elastic-plastic shell model statically. Comparison between the dynamic analysis and the static analysis of Case 1 showed clear analogy between the dynamic load and the static displacement. Case 2, however, was found to be difficult to be judged at this moment. Case 3 was conservative throughout the loaded time and suggested possibility of the conservative displacement trend for static structural test without conducting the elastic-plastic analysis.
机译:在抗震核管系统的研发领域中,利用弹塑性分析和/或结构构件测试来处理动态载荷的困难很大。在以前的研究中,分析和结构测试都是静态进行的。他们中的许多人都建议在核设计规范的现行地震准则中包括保守性。因此,如果证明地震荷载与静位移之间存在类比,则应带来更合理准则的可能性。作者通过弹性梁模型和弹塑性壳模型的有限元分析,研究了动载荷与静位移之间的类比。首先,使用弹性梁模型定义了相当于ASME / JSME规范D级限制的160%的动载荷。接下来,将定义的动载荷赋予弹塑性壳模型,以获取非线性行为,例如相对位移趋势和肘部冠部的塑性应变累积。然后,根据动态分析结果定义了三种情况下的周期性位移趋势案例1、2和3,并将它们静态地赋予了弹塑性壳模型。案例1的动态分析和静态分析之间的比较表明,动态载荷和静态位移之间有明显的类比。但是,目前很难判断案例2。情况3在整个加载时间内都是保守的,建议在不进行弹塑性分析的情况下进行静态结构测试时可能存在保守的位移趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号