...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >Comparison of effective dose and lifetime risk of cancer incidence of CT attenuation correction acquisitions and radiopharmaceutical administration for myocardial perfusion imaging
【24h】

Comparison of effective dose and lifetime risk of cancer incidence of CT attenuation correction acquisitions and radiopharmaceutical administration for myocardial perfusion imaging

机译:比较CT衰减校正和放射药物给药对心肌灌注成像的有效剂量和终生癌症风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To measure the organ dose and calculate effective dose from CT attenuation correction (CTAC) acquisitions from four commonly used gamma camera single photon emission CT/CT systems.Methods: CTAC dosimetry data was collected using thermoluminescent dosemeters on GE Healthcare's Infinia? Hawkeye? (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) four- and single-slice systems, Siemens Symbia? T6 (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) and the Philips Precedence (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Organ and effective dose from the administration of 99mTc-tetrofosmin and 99mTc-sestamibi were calculated using International Commission of Radiological Protection reports 80 and 106. Using these data, the lifetime biological risk was calculated.Results: The Siemens Symbia gave the lowest CTAC dose (1.8mSv) followed by the GE Infinia Hawkeye single- slice (1.9mSv), GE Infinia Hawkeye four-slice (2.5mSv) and Philips Precedence v. 3.0. Doses were significantly lower than the calculated doses from radiopharmaceutical administration (11 and 14mSv for 99mTc-tetrofosmin and 99mTc-sestamibi, respectively). Overall lifetime biological risks were lower, which suggests that using CTAC data posed minimal risk to the patient. Comparison of data for breast tissue demonstrated a higher risk than that from the radiopharmaceutical administration.Conclusion: CTAC doses were confirmed to be much lower than those from radiopharmaceutical administration. The localized nature of the CTAC exposure compared to the radiopharmaceutical biological distribution indicated dose and risk to the breast to be higher.Advances in knowledge: This research proved that CTAC is a comparatively low-dose acquisition. However, it has been shown that there is increased risk for breast tissue especially in the younger patients. As per legislation, justification is required and CTAC should only be used in situations that demonstrate sufficient net benefit.
机译:目的:从四个常用的伽马相机单光子发射CT / CT系统获取的CT衰减校正(CTAC)来测量器官剂量并计算有效剂量。方法:使用GE Healthcare Infinia上的热发光剂量计收集CTAC剂量数据。鹰眼? (英国白金汉郡GE Healthcare)四层和单层系统,西门子Symbia? T6(Siemens Healthcare,德国埃尔兰根)和Philips飞利浦(Philips Healthcare,荷兰阿姆斯特丹)。使用国际放射防护委员会的报告80和106计算了施用99mTc-四磷灵和99mTc-西他米比的器官和有效剂量。使用这些数据,计算出了终生生物学风险。结果:西门子Symbia的CTAC剂量最低(则分别为1.8mSv和1.8mSv,然后是GE Infinia Hawkeye单片(1.9mSv),GE Infinia Hawkeye四片(2.5mSv)和Philips Precedence v。3.0。剂量显着低于放射性药物的计算剂量(99mTc-替曲膦和99mTc-西司他比分别为11和14mSv)。整个生命周期的生物学风险较低,这表明使用CTAC数据对患者的风险最小。乳腺组织数据的比较显示出比放射药物给药更高的风险。结论:CTAC剂量被证实比放射药物给药低得多。与放射性药物生物分布相比,CTAC暴露的局部性质表明剂量和对乳房的风险更高。知识进步:这项研究证明CTAC是一种相对低剂量的药物。然而,已经显示出乳房组织的风险增加,尤其是在年轻患者中。根据法律规定,必须有正当理由,CTAC仅应在显示出足够净收益的情况下使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号