首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >Evaluation of CT coronary artery angiography with 320-row detector CT in a high-risk population
【24h】

Evaluation of CT coronary artery angiography with 320-row detector CT in a high-risk population

机译:高危人群中320行探测器CT对CT冠状动脉造影的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The aim of this article was to prospectively evaluate the accuracy and radiation dose of 320-detector row dynamic volume CT (DVCT) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a high-risk population. Methods: 60 patients with a high risk of CAD underwent DVCT without preceding heart rate control and also underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA), which served as the standard reference. Results: On a per segment analysis, overall sensitivity was 95.3%, specificity was 97.6%, positive predictive value was 90.6%, negative predictive value was 98.8% and Youden index was 0.93. In both heart rate subgroups, diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis was similar. The accuracy of the subgroup with an Agatston score ≥100 was lower than that for patients with an Agatston score <100. However, the difference between DVCT and ICA results was not significant (p=0.08). The mean estimated effective dose of CT was 12.5±9.4 mSv. In those patients with heart rates less than 70 beats per minute (bpm), the mean radiation exposure of DVCT was 5.2±0.9 mSv. The effective radiation dose was significantly lower than that of ICA (14.1±5.9 mSv) (p<0.001). When the heart rate was >70 bpm, a significantly higher dose was delivered to patients with DVCT (22.6±5.2 mSv, p<0.001) than with ICA (15.0±5.3 mSv, p<0.001). Conclusion: DVCT reliably provides high diagnostic accuracy without heart rate/ rhythm control. However, from a dosimetric point of view, it is recommended that heart rate should be controlled to <70bpm to decrease radiation dose.
机译:目的:本文的目的是前瞻性评估320排行动态容积CT(DVCT)在高危人群中检测冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的准确性和放射剂量。方法:60例高危CAD患者在未进行心率控制的情况下进行了DVCT,并且还进行了有创冠状动脉造影(ICA),作为标准参考。结果:按每部分分析,总体敏感性为95.3%,特异性为97.6%,阳性预测值为90.6%,阴性预测值为98.8%,Youden指数为0.93。在两个心率亚组中,评估冠状动脉狭窄的诊断准确性相似。 Agatston得分≥100的亚组的准确性低于Agatston得分<100的患者。但是,DVCT和ICA结果之间的差异并不显着(p = 0.08)。 CT的平均估计有效剂量为12.5±9.4 mSv。在那些心率低于每分钟70次搏动(bpm)的患者中,DVCT的平均辐射暴露为5.2±0.9 mSv。有效辐射剂量显着低于ICA(14.1±5.9 mSv)(p <0.001)。当心率> 70 bpm时,DVCT患者的剂量(22.6±5.2 mSv,p <0.001)比ICA患者的剂量(15.0±5.3 mSv,p <0.001)高得多。结论:DVCT可以可靠地提供高诊断准确性,而无需控制心律/心律。但是,从剂量学的角度来看,建议将心率控制在<70bpm以减少辐射剂量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号