首页> 外文期刊>International journal of Jungian studies >Jung, art and psychotherapy re-conceptualized by the symbol that joins us to the wildness of the universe
【24h】

Jung, art and psychotherapy re-conceptualized by the symbol that joins us to the wildness of the universe

机译:荣格(Jung),艺术和心理治疗学被象征符号重新概念化,该象征符号使我们与宇宙的旷野相连

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the impact of the publication of Jung's own (literally) monumental work of rendering images in The Red Book (2009), the relation of art, artists, art psychotherapy and Jungian studies is puzzling and complex. As Tjeu van den Berk's excellent Jung on Art (2012) demonstrates, Jung by no means posited a comfortable continuum between his psychology and aesthetics. Even artists impressed by his notions of the inherently creative unconscious imagination do not share the priorities of Jungianoriented art psychotherapists. In exploring this problem of Jungian psychology and the aesthetic domain, I take issue with some of van den Berk's conclusions, proposing instead that in his core concept of the 'symbol' Jung constructs a theory of the imagination that overcomes disciplinary, mythic and individual boundaries: rather, it is an idea of radical re-visioning of psyche as expressed in time and space. By dismantling the notion of psyche as bound to an individual person, I suggest the symbol transforms the dialogue of Jung, Jungians and art.
机译:尽管在《红皮书》(2009年)中出版了荣格自己的(字面意义上的)渲染图像的巨著,但艺术,艺术家,艺术心理疗法和荣格研究之间的关系令人困惑和复杂。正如Tjeu van den Berk的出色的《艺术上的荣格》(2012年)所证明的那样,荣格绝不在他的心理学和美学之间建立舒适的连续体。即使是对固有的创造性潜意识想象力印象深刻的艺术家,也不认同以荣格为导向的艺术心理治疗师的工作重点。在探讨荣格心理学和美学领域的问题时,我对范登·伯克的一些结论持怀疑态度,相反,他提出在荣格的“符号”核心概念中建立一种超越学科,神话和个人界限的想象力理论:相反,它是一种以时间和空间表达的对心理进行彻底重新定义的想法。通过消除与个人绑定的心理概念,我建议该符号改变了荣格,荣格主义者和艺术之间的对话。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号