首页> 外文期刊>International journal of law and psychiatry >Commitment without confinement. Outpatient compulsory care for substance abuse, and severe mental disorder in Sweden
【24h】

Commitment without confinement. Outpatient compulsory care for substance abuse, and severe mental disorder in Sweden

机译:无拘无束的承诺。瑞典针对药物滥用和严重精神障碍的门诊强制性护理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Sweden, a person with severe substance abuse or a severe mental disorder may be committed to compulsory care according to two different legislations. Both acts include an option of providing involuntary care outside the premises of an institution - care in other forms (COF) and compulsory community care (CCC), respectively. As co-occurring disorders are commonplace many individuals will be subject to both types of compulsory care. The structures of both legislations and their provisions for compulsory care in the community are therefore scrutinized and compared. Based on a distinction between "least restrictive" or "preventative" schemes the article compares COF and CCC in order to determine whether they serve different purposes. The analysis shows that COF and CCC both share the same avowed aims of reducing time spent in confinement and facilitating transition to voluntary care and the community. But they also serve different purposes, something which is reflected in disparate scopes, eligibility criteria, rules, and practices. Overall, COF was found to be a more "least restrictive" and CCC a more "preventative" scheme. The distinction is associated with COF being an established part of legislation on compulsory care for substance abuse with a universal scope and CCC being a recent addition to compulsory psychiatric care legislation with a selective character. (C) 2016 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:在瑞典,根据两项不同的法律,患有严重滥用药物或严重精神障碍的人可能会被强制接受义务治疗。这两项法案都提供了在机构场所之外提供非自愿护理的选择,分别是其他形式的护理(COF)和强制性社区护理(CCC)。由于同时发生的疾病很普遍,因此许多人都必须接受两种类型的强制护理。因此,对这两项立法的结构及其在社区中的义务照护规定进行了审查和比较。基于“最不严格”或“预防”方案之间的区别,本文比较了COF和CCC,以确定它们是否具有不同的用途。分析表明,COF和CCC都具有相同的宣称的目标,即减少在分娩时所花费的时间,并促进向志愿服务和社区的过渡。但是它们也有不同的目的,这反映在不同的范围,资格标准,规则和实践中。总体而言,发现COF的限制更小,而CCC的预防性更强。这种区别与COF是具有普遍适用范围的强制性药物滥用护理立法的既定组成部分以及CCC是强制性精神病护理立法的最新补充(具有选择性)有关。 (C)2016作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号