首页> 外文期刊>International journal of law and psychiatry >Differences and similarities in cross-cultural perceptions of boundaries: A comparison of results from two studies
【24h】

Differences and similarities in cross-cultural perceptions of boundaries: A comparison of results from two studies

机译:跨文化对边界的理解的差异和相似之处:两项研究结果的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been substantial literature on boundary excursions in clinician-patient relationships; however, very little empirical research exists. Even less information exists on how perceptions of this issue might differ across cultures. Prior to this study, empirical data on various kinds of boundary excursions were collected in different cultural contexts. First, clinicians from the US. and Brazil were asked to rate 173 boundary excursions for both their perceived harmfulness and their professional unacceptability (Miller et al., 2006). In a second study, colleagues from Qatar administered a slightly modified version to mental health care professional staff of a hospital in Doha, Qatar (Ghuloum et al., 2011). In this paper, the results of these two separate studies are compared. The results showed some similarities and some differences in perceptions of the boundary behaviors. For example, both sets of cultures seem to agree that certain behaviors are seriously harmful and/or professionally unacceptable. These behaviors include some frankly sexual behavior, such as having sexual intercourse with a patient, as well as behavior related to doing business with the patient, and some disclosing behavior. There are also significant cultural differences in perceptions of how harmful some of the behaviors are. Qatari practitioners seemed to rate certain behaviors that within therapy mix disclosing or personal behavior with therapy as more harmful, but behaviors that involved interacting with patients outside of therapy as less serious. A factor analysis suggested that participants in U.S./Brazil saw a much larger number of behaviors as making up a set of Core Boundary Violations, whereas Qatari respondents separated sexual behaviors from others. Finally, a Rasch analysis showed that both cultures perceived a continuum of boundary behaviors, from those that are least harmful or unprofessional to those that are highly harmful or unprofessional. One interpretation is that cultural factors may be most influential on those kinds of behaviors that are perceived as relatively less serious. Implications for training and supervision are also discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:关于临床医生与病人之间的边界漂移,已有大量文献报道。然而,很少有实证研究。关于跨文化对这个问题的看法可能如何不同的信息甚至更少。在这项研究之前,在不同文化背景下收集了各种边界旅行的经验数据。首先,来自美国的临床医生。巴西和巴西被要求对173个边界游览的危害性和职业不可接受性进行评分(Miller等,2006)。在第二项研究中,来自卡塔尔的同事向卡塔尔多哈一家医院的精神保健专业人员提供了稍微修改的版本(Ghuloum等,2011)。在本文中,将比较这两个单独研究的结果。结果表明,对边界行为的理解有些相似和不同。例如,两种文化似乎都同意某些行为是严重有害的和/或专业上不可接受的。这些行为包括一些坦率的性行为,例如与患者发生性行为,以及与患者做生意有关的行为,以及一些揭露性行为。在对某些行为有多有害的认识上,文化上也存在重大差异。卡塔尔(Qatari)的从业者似乎将治疗中披露或个人行为与治疗混为一谈的某些行为危害更大,而与治疗之外患者进行互动的行为则较不严重。一项因素分析表明,美国/巴西的参与者认为构成一系列核心边界违规行为的数量要多得多,而卡塔尔受访者则将性行为与其他行为分开。最后,Rasch分析表明,两种文化都感知到边界行为的连续性,从危害最小或不专业的文化到高度危害或不专业的文化。一种解释是,文化因素可能对那些被认为相对不那么严重的行为具有最大的影响力。还讨论了培训和监督的含义。 (C)2012 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号