首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology >A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care.
【24h】

A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care.

机译:药物和手术终止妊娠的比较:选择,情感影响和护理满意度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether women having medical or surgical terminations of pregnancy differ in their emotional distress before or after the procedure. To evaluate whether choice of procedure occurs, the factors influencing type of procedure and the effect of choice on emotional responses and satisfaction with care. DESIGN: A prospective comparative study. SETTING: A termination of pregnancy unit in a University Teaching Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and seventy-five women attending for medical or surgical first trimester termination of pregnancy. METHODS: Interviews concerning choice and measures of emotional status were completed prior to terminations. Four weeks after termination emotional functioning was reassessed together with satisfaction with care. RESULTS: Women having a surgical termination waited longer for the procedure and were at more advanced gestation than those having the medical termination. There were no differences in emotional responses related to type of procedure or gestation. One-quarter remained highly anxious at four weeks. Medical and surgical groups did not differ in emotional status prior to termination. Those having the medical procedure rated it as marginally more stressful and experienced more post-termination physical problems and disruption to life. Seeing the fetus was associated with more intrusive events (nightmares, flashbacks, unwanted thoughts related to the experience). One-quarter of the medical and 67% of the surgical group reported having no choice in type of procedure. Only 53% of the medical group would choose the same procedure again compared with 77% of the surgical group. CONCLUSIONS: Termination method did not influence emotional adjustment. Many women were not offered genuine choice of procedure. Having choice was considered very important but was unrelated to emotional distress or satisfaction with care.
机译:目的:调查在手术前或手术后因内科或外科方式终止妊娠的妇女在情绪困扰方面是否有所不同。为了评估是否选择手术,影响手术类型的因素以及选择对情绪反应和护理满意度的影响。设计:一项前瞻性比较研究。地点:大学教学医院终止妊娠的单位。参与者:275名因内胎或内胎手术而终止妊娠的妇女。方法:在终止之前完成有关选择和情绪状态测量的访谈。终止治疗后四周,对情绪功能进行了重新评估,并得到了护理满意度。结果:与有医疗终止措施的妇女相比,接受外科手术终止的妇女等待手术的时间更长,并且妊娠晚期。与手术类型或妊娠相关的情绪反应没有差异。四分之一的人四分之一仍然感到焦虑。在终止治疗之前,医学和外科手术组的情绪状态没有差异。那些接受过医疗程序治疗的人认为它的压力稍大一些,并且在终结后遇到了更多的身体问题和生命中断。看到胎儿与更多侵入性事件(噩梦,倒叙,与体验有关的不需要的想法)相关联。四分之一的医疗人员和67%的外科手术组表示无法选择手术类型。与手术组的77%相比,只有53%的医疗组会再次选择相同的程序。结论:终止方法不影响情绪调节。没有为许多妇女提供真正的程序选择。选择被认为非常重要,但与情绪困扰或护理满意度无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号