首页> 外文期刊>International journal of computerized dentistry >InLab and Cerec Connect: Virtual contacts in maximum intercuspation compared with original contacts - An in vitro study [InLab und Cerec-Connect: Virtuelle kontakte in schlussbisslage im vergleich zu den originalen kontakten - Eine in-vitro-studie]
【24h】

InLab and Cerec Connect: Virtual contacts in maximum intercuspation compared with original contacts - An in vitro study [InLab und Cerec-Connect: Virtuelle kontakte in schlussbisslage im vergleich zu den originalen kontakten - Eine in-vitro-studie]

机译:InLab和Cerec Connect:与原始接触相比,虚拟接触的插入性最大-一项体外研究[InLab和Cerec Connect:与原始接触相比,虚拟接触器处于最终咬合的位置-一项体外研究]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of inLab and Cerec Connect software in simulating the maximum intercuspal contacts in comparison to the real situation on the respective gypsum casts. Materials and Methods: Ten pairs of maxillary and mandibular casts were mounted in articulators in maximum intercuspal position. The contacts of the gypsum casts were marked and digital photographs of the mandibular casts were taken. Digital impressions of arches were made using two different software packages; inLab (Version 3.83) and Cerec Connect (Version 3.83) using the Cerec Acquisition Center. The intercuspal position of the teeth was captured by buccal images. Screenshots of the virtual casts showing the occlusal contacts were saved. The digital photographs of the contacts of the cast and the screenshots of the occlusal contacts were superimposed using an image processing program. The number of contacts of the virtual mandibular models that were identical with the contacts of the gypsum casts were determined and calculated as percentages in relation to the gypsum cast contacts, which were set as 100%. The null hypothesis tested was that the Cerec connect software delivers contacts that are closer to the real situation than contacts created with the inLab software. Results: Cerec Connect showed a median percentage of 41.6% and Inlab a median percentage of 31.9%. The Wilcoxon test revealed statistically significant differences between the inLab software and Cerec Connect. Especially at the contra-lateral side of that side where the virtual buccal registration was done, the contacts showed the greatest deviations from the original. Conclusion: Cerec Connect more precisely virtually simulated the real contacts than did inLab when scanning full-arch dentitions.
机译:目的:这项体外研究的目的是评估inLab和Cerec Connect软件与各个石膏模型的实际情况相比,模拟最大牙间接触的准确性。材料和方法:将十对上颌和下颌铸件安装在咬合架中,最大牙间位置。标记石膏铸件的接触,并拍摄下颌铸件的数字照片。使用两个不同的软件包制作了拱门的数字印象;使用Cerec Acquisition Center的inLab(版本3.83)和Cerec Connect(版本3.83)。通过颊侧图像捕获牙齿的牙间位置。显示了咬合接触的虚拟演员的屏幕快照已保存。使用图像处理程序叠加演员的联系人的数字照片和咬合联系人的屏幕快照。确定与石膏铸件的接触相同的虚拟下颌模型的接触数,并以相对于石膏铸件的接触的百分比(其设为100%)进行计算。测试的原假设是Cerec connect软件提供的联系比使用inLab软件创建的联系更接近实际情况。结果:Cerec Connect的中位数百分比为41.6%,Inlab的中位数百分比为31.9%。 Wilcoxon测试揭示了inLab软件和Cerec Connect之间的统计学差异。尤其是在进行颊侧虚拟定位的那一侧的对侧,接触点显示出与原始接触的最大偏差。结论:当扫描全拱齿时,与inLab相比,Cerec Connect更精确地模拟了真实的接触。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号