首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management >Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. (Special Issue: Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services.)
【24h】

Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. (Special Issue: Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services.)

机译:绘制生态系统服务供给的方法:综述。 (特刊:量化和绘制生态系统服务图。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mapping key areas for ecosystem service (ES) supply is essential for the development of strategies that will ensure their future supply. Given the rapid development in this area of research, we performed a review of different approaches used to map ES, with a special focus on those that use social-ecological data. We used an analytical framework based on five criteria for analyzing and comparing the methodological approaches: the types of ES, availability of data sources, types of data sources, spatial scale, and methods used to model ES. We found that regulating services were the most commonly mapped, followed by provisioning, cultural, and supporting services. Secondary (readily available) data were used more frequently than primary data to map ES. Biophysical data (land-cover variables) and mixed sources (databases like global statistics) were the most commonly employed ones. Most studies were performed at the regional or at the national scale. The most commonly used method to model services was the development of models based on the well-known causal relationships between environmental variables, followed by the extrapolation of ES values from primary data to the total analyzed area frequently using land-cover maps. Our synthesis reveals that the majority of studies are based on secondary data, applied at broad scales, without validation techniques. There is an urgent need to develop methods for deepening our understanding of the social-ecological processes behind the supply of ES in order to improve our ability to map ES for decision making.
机译:确定生态系统服务(ES)供应的关键领域对于制定确保未来供应的战略至关重要。鉴于该研究领域的快速发展,我们对用于ES映射的不同方法进行了回顾,特别关注那些使用社会生态数据的方法。我们使用了基于五个标准的分析框架来分析和比较方法论方法:ES的类型,数据源的可用性,数据源的类型,空间规模以及用于ES建模的方法。我们发现调节服务是最常见的图,其次是供应,文化和支持服务。映射ES的次要(现成的)数据比主要数据使用的频率更高。生物物理数据(土地覆盖变量)和混合源(数据库,如全球统计数据)是最常用的数据。大多数研究是在地区或全国范围内进行的。服务建模最常用的方法是根据环境变量之间众所周知的因果关系开发模型,然后使用土地覆盖图将ES值从原始数据外推到总分析区域。我们的综合表明,大多数研究都是基于二手数据,没有经过验证即可广泛应用。迫切需要开发一种方法,以加深我们对ES背后的社会生态过程的理解,以提高我们为决策而绘制ES的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号