首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management >Assessing the effectiveness of policies in sustaining and promoting ecosystem services in the Indian Himalayas
【24h】

Assessing the effectiveness of policies in sustaining and promoting ecosystem services in the Indian Himalayas

机译:评估政策在维持和促进印度喜马拉雅山生态系统服务方面的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examined existing policy instruments of the Indian forest, wildlife, and environment sectors for the period 1927-2008 to (a) assess their strengths and weaknesses in addressing information, market and policy failures in ecosystem service provisionin the Indian Himalayan region and (b) determine if they were informatory or regulatory in nature and whether they encouraged the use of market-based instruments. Our analysis revealed that Indian policy measures can be categorized into four eras: Production (1927-1972), Protection (1972-1988), Community Participation (1988-2006), and Climate Change and Globalization (2006 onwards). Trie policies of the earlier two eras were largely regulatory in nature. From 1988 onwards, community participation in biodiversity conservation has made the policies more informatory and market-based. The recognition that Himalayas are a distinct ecosystem, crucial for their services but vulnerable to climate change impacts, has come about only with the National Mission onSustaining Himalayan Ecosystem. Given the multiple stakeholders in Indian Himalayas and the off-site nature of ecosystem services, a complementarity of instruments and their ability to address the consequences of local decisions on downstream ecosystemservices are essential. A participatory and sectorally coordinated mixed governance approach is needed to sustain ecosystem services in the region.
机译:我们研究了1927-2008年间印度森林,野生动植物和环境部门的现有政策工具,以(a)评估其在解决印度喜马拉雅地区生态系统服务提供中的信息,市场和政策失灵方面的优势和劣势,以及(b)确定它们本质上是提供信息或监管,是否鼓励使用基于市场的工具。我们的分析表明,印度的政策措施可以分为四个时代:生产(1927-1972年),保护(1972-1988年),社区参与(1988-2006年)以及气候变化与全球化(2006年开始)。前两个时代的特里政策本质上是监管性的。从1988年开始,社区对生物多样性保护的参与使政策更加具有信息性和市场基础。认识到喜马拉雅山是一个独特的生态系统,对他们的服务至关重要,但容易受到气候变化的影响,这仅是通过国家维持喜马拉雅生态系统使命来实现的。鉴于印度喜马拉雅山的利益相关者众多,而且生态系统服务的性质偏远,因此,必须要有各种手段的互补性以及它们应对当地决策对下游生态系统服务后果的能力。需要一种参与性和部门协调的混合治理方法,以维持该区域的生态系统服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号