首页> 外文期刊>Information Sciences: An International Journal >Fuzzy financial profitability analyses of demand side management alternatives from participant perspective
【24h】

Fuzzy financial profitability analyses of demand side management alternatives from participant perspective

机译:参与者视角下需求侧管理方案的模糊财务盈利能力分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper derives fuzzy profitability models for the financial evaluation of different demand side management (DSM) alternatives. The present value of cost (PVC) and equivalent uniform annual cost (EUAC) models are selected to determine the least-cost Solution, while the net present Value (NPV), pay back year (PBY) and benefit/cost ratio (BCR) models are proposed for the execution of cost-benefit analysis. Since fuzzy results are in the form of a complex non-linear representation, and do not always provide a totally ordered set in the same way that crisp numbers do, the current paper approximates the resulting fuzzy profitability indexes by a triangular fuzzy number initially, and then uses the Mellin transform to obtain the means and variances of the approximated fuzzy numbers in order to determine their relative ranking in a decision-making process. The performance of the proposed models is verified through the simulation of a numerical example and by considering their application to two practical DSM programs in Taiwan. In the first case Study, the fuzzy least-cost solution is used to decide upon the installation of either a conventional air conditioning system or a cooling energy storage (CES) air conditioning system. In the second case study relating to cogeneration, a fuzzy cost-benefit analysis is applied to compare the relative profitabilities of an Extracted Condensing Steam Turbine Generator system and a Backpressure Steam Turbine Generator system. These investigations confirm not only that the results of the proposed fuzzy economic models are consistent with those of the conventional crisp models, but also demonstrate that the proposed methods represent readily implemented possibility analysis tools for use in the arena of uncertain financial decision-making. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文推导了用于不同需求侧管理(DSM)备选方案的财务评估的模糊获利模型。选择成本的现值(PVC)和等效的统一年成本(EUAC)模型来确定成本最低的解决方案,而净现值(NPV),投资回收年(PBY)和收益/成本比(BCR)提出了用于执行成本效益分析的模型。由于模糊结果以复杂的非线性表示形式出现,并且并不总是以与清晰数字相同的方式提供完全有序的集合,因此,本文首先通过三角模糊数来近似得出的模糊获利能力指标,并且然后使用Mellin变换获得近似模糊数的均值和方差,以便确定它们在决策过程中的相对排名。通过数值例子的仿真并考虑了它们在台湾两个实际DSM程序中的应用,验证了所提出模型的性能。在第一个案例研究中,模糊最小成本解决方案用于确定安装传统空调系统或冷却能量存储(CES)空调系统的方式。在与热电联产有关的第二个案例研究中,应用模糊成本效益分析来比较抽汽式冷凝式汽轮发电机系统和背压式汽轮发电机系统的相对收益。这些研究不仅证实了所提出的模糊经济模型的结果与传统的明晰模型的结果是一致的,而且证明了所提出的方法代表了易于实施的可能性分析工具,可用于不确定的金融决策领域。 (C)2004 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号