...
首页> 外文期刊>International and Comparative Law Quarterly >'WARS ON TERROR' AND VICARIOUS HEGEMONS: THE UK, INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND THE NORTHERN IRELAND CONFLICT
【24h】

'WARS ON TERROR' AND VICARIOUS HEGEMONS: THE UK, INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND THE NORTHERN IRELAND CONFLICT

机译:“恐怖战争”和各种霸权:英国,国际法和北爱尔兰冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The hegemonic position of the United States, and its implication for international law, are rapidly emerging as sites of intense scholarly interest. It is a truism that the fall of the Berlin wall has been followed by a period of unprecedented American predominance in the military, economic, and political spheres. Replacing the bi-polar certainties of the Cold War is a world in flux, dominated, to a significant extent, by one remaining superpower, or, in the words of the former French Foreign Minister, Hubert Vedrine, by a 'hyper-power'. Some though, have emphasised the continuing importance of other loci of (lesser) power in a 'uni-multipolar' world. That this domination posed critical questions for international law was obvious well before the 9/11 atrocities, as the debate over NATO's use of force in Kosovo illustrated. Since the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and with the global 'war on terror' reaching into ever-increasing spheres, the debate has intensified significantly.
机译:美国的霸权地位及其对国际法的影响,正迅速成为学术界高度关注的场所。柏林墙倒塌之后是美国在军事,经济和政治领域空前占主导地位的时期,这是不言而喻的。取代冷战的两极确定性的世界是一个不断变化的世界,在很大程度上,这是由一个剩余的超级大国,或者用法国前外交大臣赫伯特·韦德林说的,由一个“超级大国”主导的。 。但是,有些人强调了(较小)权力的其他场所在“单多极”世界中的持续重要性。正如关于北约在科索沃使用武力的辩论所表明的那样,这种统治对国际法提出了至关重要的问题,这在9/11暴行之前就已经很明显了。自从入侵阿富汗和伊拉克,以及随着全球“反恐战争”进入不断扩大的领域以来,辩论已大大加剧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号