...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial Minerals >Silica litigation in the USA
【24h】

Silica litigation in the USA

机译:美国的硅胶诉讼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The first update on silica litigation published in October (see IM October '05, p.72) summarised the events described in the MDL Decision issued on 30 June 2005 by Judge Janis Graham Jack. The MDL Decision described a scheme involving certain lawyers, doctors and screening companies to manufacture silica litigation for their own financial benefit; in the words of Judge Jack, the cases were "manufactured for money". This article will review the specific responses to the MDL Decision and offer some thoughts on the future of silica litigation (the MDL Decision is available online at http://docs.indl 1553.com/docs/5569.pdf). It is important to note that this article is about silica litigation, not silicosis. By describing silica litigation in the US, it is not intended to make light of what can be a serious disease. Finally, this article is about a rapidly evolving issue; by the time that this appears in print, the story may have taken an unexpected turn.
机译:10月发布的关于二氧化硅诉讼的第一次更新(请参阅IM 05年10月,第72页)总结了Janis Graham Jack法官在2005年6月30日发布的MDL决定中描述的事件。 MDL决定描述了一项计划,其中涉及某些律师,医生和筛查公司,以为其自身的经济利益进行硅石诉讼;用杰克法官的话说,这些案件是“为钱制造的”。本文将回顾对MDL决定的具体回应,并对未来的硅谷诉讼提出一些想法(MDL决定可从http://docs.indl 1553.com/docs/5569.pdf在线获得)。重要的是要注意,本文是关于二氧化硅诉讼,而不是硅肺病。通过在美国描述硅石诉讼,并不旨在说明可能是一种严重的疾病。最后,本文是关于一个迅速发展的问题的。到印刷版出现时,故事可能已经发生了意外的转变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号