首页> 外文期刊>Annals of clinical biochemistry. >Assessment of the practicability and analytical performance of a point-of-care affinity chromatography haemoglobin A1c analyser for use in the non-laboratory setting.
【24h】

Assessment of the practicability and analytical performance of a point-of-care affinity chromatography haemoglobin A1c analyser for use in the non-laboratory setting.

机译:评估在非实验室环境中使用的即时亲和色谱血红蛋白A1c分析仪的实用性和分析性能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) is a pivotal pathology test used around the world for the long-term management of patients with diabetes. Point-of-care testing (POCT) provides a convenient means for conducting HbA(1c) testing outside the laboratory. METHODS: The practicability and analytical performance of the Micromat II POCT HbA(1c) analyser (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA), which has affinity chromatography as its methods principle, was evaluated in Australia and compared with the DCA 2000 POCT device (Bayer Australia) and a laboratory-based high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. RESULTS: Overall between-day imprecision over 10 days was 1.9% for the laboratory HPLC method, 2.2% for the DCA 2000 and 7.0% for the Micromat II. In a second study over the same time period, the Micromat II's imprecision was 6.4%. The mean difference between the Micromat II and the laboratory method in a patient comparison (n = 100) was -0.25% (lower and upper limits of agreement -1.79 to 1.30). CONCLUSIONS: The imprecision obtained with the Micromat II was inferior to both the DCA 2000 and laboratory methods and did not meet current internationally accepted precision goals for this analyte. The Micromat II's poor imprecision can be explained by the high degree of technical expertise needed to perform the test; its use by non-laboratory health professionals such as nurses and Aboriginal health workers in rural and remote Australia cannot be recommended.
机译:背景:血红蛋白A(1c)(HbA(1c))是世界各地用于糖尿病患者长期治疗的关键病理学测试。即时检验(POCT)提供了一种在实验室外进行HbA(1c)测试的便捷方法。方法:在澳大利亚评估了以亲和色谱为方法原理的Micromat II POCT HbA(1c)分析仪(美国Bio-Rad Laboratories)的实用性和分析性能,并与DCA 2000 POCT设备(Bayer Australia)进行了比较。 )和基于实验室的高效液相色谱(HPLC)方法。结果:实验室HPLC方法在10天内的日间总体不准确度为1.9%,DCA 2000为2.2%,Micromat II为7.0%。在同一时期的第二项研究中,Micromat II的不精确度为6.4%。在患者比较(n = 100)中,Micromat II与实验室方法之间的平均差异为-0.25%(一致性的上下限-1.79至1.30)。结论:用Micromat II获得的不精密度不如DCA 2000和实验室方法,并且不符合该分析物当前国际公认的精度目标。 Micromat II的不精确性很差,这可以通过执行测试所需的高度专业技术来解释。不建议在澳大利亚农村和偏远地区的非实验室卫生专业人员(例如护士和原住民卫生工作者)使用它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号