首页> 外文期刊>Australian Farm Journal >Avoiding crop damage from residual herbicides
【24h】

Avoiding crop damage from residual herbicides

机译:避免残留除草剂对农作物造成损害

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The herbicide label is the primary source of information on herbicide use and growers should read them thoroughly to check residual activity and cropping restrictions. This article by Katherine Holloway discusses how herbicides break down and gives extra information on specific herbicides. SOME herbicides can remain active in the soil for weeks, months or years. This can be an advantage as it ensures good long-term weed control. However, if the herbicide stays in the soil longer than intended it maydamage sensitive crop or pasture species sown in subsequent years. For example, chlorsulfuron is used in wheat and barley, but can remain active in the soil for several years and damage legumes and oilseeds. A real problem for growers is the difficulty in identifying herbicide residues before they cause a problem. Currently, we are limited to predicting carryover based on information provided on the product labels about soil type and climate. Herbicide residues are often too small to be detected by chemical analysis, or if the testing is possible it is too expensive to be part of routine farming.
机译:除草剂标签是有关除草剂使用情况的主要信息来源,种植者应彻底阅读它们以检查残留活性和种植限制。凯瑟琳·霍洛威(Katherine Holloway)的这篇文章讨论了除草剂如何分解,并提供了有关特定除草剂的更多信息。一些除草剂可以在土壤中保持活性数周,数月或数年。这可以是一个优点,因为它可以确保长期的良好除草效果。但是,如果除草剂在土壤中的停留时间比预期的长,则可能会损害随后几年播种的敏感农作物或草场物种。例如,氯磺隆用于小麦和大麦中,但可以在土壤中保持活跃数年,并损害豆类和油料种子。种植者面临的一个真正问题是难以在除草剂残留引起问题之前对其进行鉴定。目前,我们仅限于根据产品标签上提供的有关土壤类型和气候的信息来预测残留量。除草剂残留量通常太少而无法通过化学分析检测到,或者如果可以进行检测,则太昂贵了,无法参加常规耕作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号